Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Vehicle tax bill sparks probe

Dorchester County office gave some breaks, audit finds

The Post and Courier
Friday, May 30, 2008


Dorchester County Councilman Mike Murphree thought it was odd late last year when the vehicle tax bill on his 2004 Mercedes convertible rang up at a mere $200. Somehow, the Auditor's Office slashed the value of his luxury car from about $45,000 to $15,000.

"I said, 'Are you sure this is right?' Everybody did a head nod and out the door I went."

Then he started hearing rumors that employees in the Auditor's Office were handing out unwarranted vehicle tax breaks to family and friends. Murphree's suspicions, coupled with subsequent concerns raised by Auditor Brenda Nix, were confirmed this week when an outside accounting firm told County Council that an initial review of vehicle tax records indicates an alarming trend.

Several employees in the Auditor's Office might have improperly reduced vehicle tax bills on thousands of vehicles over several years. If even a fraction approach the $500 break that Murphree got, the hit to county coffers could be tens of thousands of dollars or more.

Vehicle tax revenues pump some $16 million into county coffers every year, helping pay for schools, public safety and other services.

Nix, who has worked in the office for 30 years, approached County Council in April after discovering discrepancies in her office's vehicle tax records. She brought in an accounting firm to conduct a cursory look, and the results were reported to council members Tuesday in a closed-door meeting.

Councilman Chris Murphy said the early results are troubling.

"They found thousands and thousands of questionable transactions," Murphy said. "At best, it's gross negligence. At worst, there's criminal liability there."

Council Chairman Larry Hargett said that because Nix is a constitutionally elected officer, council must defer to her. But he said he believes Nix has handled the matter appropriately by trying to get to the bottom of what happened.

Nix did not return calls seeking comment.

Council members say Nix now has several decisions before her. First, she must decide whether to have the accounting firm dig deeper and conduct a full audit. If she does that, she'll have to decide whether any discipline is warranted or whether the matter should be referred to the Solicitor's Office for possible criminal charges.

Nix was appointed auditor by Gov. Mark Sanford in October to fill out the term of Johnette Connelley, who resigned to become finance director for the Berkeley County Water and Sanitation Authority.

Nix is not running for the office in next month's primary, but that hasn't insulated her from charges that she is playing politics. In April, Nix suspended one of her clerks, Teresa Smoak Messex, for failing to follow procedure on the sale of a mobile home. Messex is running for the auditor's seat.

Messex could not be reached Thursday for comment. But in an earlier interview, she said the office had no procedure in the case of the mobile home sale, and she accused Nix of trying to sabotage her campaign.

Connelley said Thursday that the Auditor's Office received clean outside audits every year she was in charge and that she is shocked by the allegations now swirling around her former colleagues.

Connelley said it would have been nearly impossible for her to detect any kind of fraud because her job was to focus on the big picture and make sure the books balanced. "This is a shock to me. If I had any inkling and proof, I'd have fired them."

The process of valuing vehicles can be subjective because different companies might assign different values to the same car. But state law entitles vehicle owners to only one reduction, based on high mileage, damage or some other appeal, Connelley said. "The taxpayer wants it as low as they can get it," she said.

Murphree said that in his case, and he suspects those of many others, the Auditor's Office illegally applied multiple tax reductions.

For his part, Murphree said that as soon as he realized he received a discount he wasn't entitled to, he returned to the Auditor's Office and paid the higher tax value, an extra $500 or so. "I didn't ask for this. I'm not going to be a part of this at all."

He wonders how the county ever will collect the money lost over the years to improper tax assessments. Who will 'fess up? And could the county now charge those who got breaks?

"Taxpayers in this county were shorted thousands and thousands of dollars," Murphy said. "I don't believe we will ever know how much was lost."

Reach Ron Menchaca at rmenchaca@postandcourier.com or 937-5724.




Article tools




Latest local stories




Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  15 comment(s)

Posted by zoomru on May 30, 2008 at 8:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Prime example why we do not need property taxes. We need a state FAIRTAX...period. Please read at www.fairtax.org
Why should anyone lose something they work and pay for to OWN outright?



Posted by Hey_U_Guys on May 30, 2008 at 8:06 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Holy crap. There are a few honest people left.



Posted by jk_newhard on May 30, 2008 at 8:07 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Thank you, Councilman Murphree for having the integrity to bring this to our attention. I live in Dorchester and don't mind paying my taxes as long as everyone pays their fair share.



Posted by Neponset on May 30, 2008 at 8:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I suggest that our folks check out Charleston Co.



Posted by lou9 on May 30, 2008 at 10:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Ray Nash, Randy Scott, and now this. Dorchester County politics at its best.
Zoomru, you hit the nail on the head. We will never own anything as long as there are property taxes.



Posted by wpc3iop on May 30, 2008 at 11:23 a.m. (Suggest removal)

The "good old boy" system seems to be alive and well everywhere you turn...it's a shame I'm not one of the good old boys!



Posted by DorchesterFYI on May 30, 2008 at 11:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I agree - kudoos to Murphree for coming clean, to Murphy for participating in the story, and to Nix for pushing for the audit when she knew something was awry.

You would think Dorchester County would have learned it's lesson about accusing leaders of "politics" when they call for an investigation. The simple truth is that if the investigation proves there is wrongdoing, it doesn't matter what motivated the request. What matters is fixing these problems and ensuring that taxpayer's money is protected. I hope Nix moves forward in prosecuting those that have taken from our tax base.



Posted by ColdBeer on May 30, 2008 at 11:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Murphree and Nix have both performed honorably in this instance. Well Done!

zoomru, the "fair" tax you speak of is a scam and a failure. It wouldn't work at all.



Posted by Girleygirl on May 30, 2008 at 12:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)

This is bad! Kudos to Nix & Murphee for doing their job!



Posted by Picky on May 30, 2008 at 1:51 p.m. (Suggest removal)

It takes courage to stand up to the good ol' boys. Nix & Murphee are awesome! It's good to see integrity in local government - restores faith.



Posted by CaptPete on May 30, 2008 at 3:38 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I would not know Murphree on the street. How would the clerks know to give him a break ?



Posted by scsthrnbelle on May 30, 2008 at 4:06 p.m. (Suggest removal)

He's an attorney with a business in St. George ~ the court house is in St. George ~ everyone knows everybody there.



Posted by scsthrnbelle on May 30, 2008 at 4:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)

My bad...that's Murphy. Don't know how they knew him.



Posted by MeanMom on May 30, 2008 at 7:46 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I would like to know if this has been going on for 30 years. I would also like to know why Mr. Murphree sat back and waited to address this problem till he "started hearing rumors." Maybe the rumors were about him and others in the good ol' bubba system? I'm sure those rumors were circulating the entire time that Ms. Connelly was in charge. Where are the checks and balances? Did no one ever do spot checks of the accuracy of the assessments? Shouldn't this be part of any annual audit? I hope that a full audit is done and that those who owe money will be assessed for their past due amounts. A good place to start would be with past and current Dorchester County Council members. Then, we can move on to all their family members and friends!



Posted by flowerchild55 on May 30, 2008 at 11:49 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Apparently Mr. Murphree did not wait until he started hearing rumors. He went to the auditors office to ask if it was correct. More than some folks would probably do.




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)