Governor's pen might free up cash
Vetoes put priority on prisons, fuel for buses
The Post and Courier
Thursday, May 29, 2008
Mary Ann Chastain/AP
South Carolina Gov. Mark Sanford
On the list
Gov. Mark Sanford announced 69 vetoes he made to the state's $7 billion budget, set to begin in July. The vetoes would free up $72 million. Here's a look at some of the cuts: --$21.3 million, expansion of the state-federal State Children's Health Insurance Program. --$18.4 million, competitive grants program for water, sewer, tourism, economic development and festival projects. --$7 million, for Medical University of South Carolina programs, including $575,000 to cover indigent patient care and $600,000 for the Hollings Cancer Center. --$4.5 million for high-speed data connection at Clemson University, the University of South Carolina and MUSC. --$4 million, to hire and staff public defender offices. --$3 million, College of Charleston programs. --$3 million, grants to 13 rural hospitals. --$2.5 million, hydrogen fuel research. --$1.1 million, indigent defense in criminal domestic violence cases. --$1 million, to cover indigent defense costs in DUI cases. --$12,500, McClellanville Arts Council. --$257,317, H.L. Hunley Security. --$250,000, MUSC's rural dentist program.
COLUMBIA — Gov. Mark Sanford used his veto pen to free up $72 million that he believes the state Legislature should direct toward school bus fuel and prisons but, as in years past, the question is how many of his vetoes actually will survive. In all, Sanford vetoed 69 items from the upcoming $7 billion budget — a list much shorter than he usually offers. "The vetoes represent one final chance to further impact the spending that takes place in our family budget of South Carolina," Sanford said. Last year the House alone spent more than 10 hours on the floor considering the governor's 243 vetoes, ultimately overriding all but 15. At that time, Senate President Pro Tem Glenn McConnell and House Speaker Bobby Harrell, both Charleston Republicans, said more of Sanford's vetoes would be sustained if there weren't so many of them. The more Sanford vetoes, the more legislators form alliances. McConnell said Wednesday that the governor might see more success this year. "Not having hundreds of them makes it easier," said McConnell, who couldn't offer specifics after finishing a full day on the Senate floor and not having had the chance, like most legislators, to examine the list. One of the lead budget writers, Rep. Dan Cooper, R-Piedmont, said he doesn't expect the Legislature to react any differently to the vetoes this year. The House has gone through many of the same vetoes year after year. "I don't know why they'd change their mind," he said. Still, Sanford said the Legislature removed $142 million of the $167 million in spending, or 85 percent, of what was vetoed last year. Those projects are not part of the current budget. Most special projects were left out of the budget, which starts in July, because of an economic slump that's expected to make revenue tight. The veto list contains a lot of familiar items, with higher-education spending taking a typically hard hit. If sustained, the College of Charleston would lose about $3 million for programs in hospitality, tourism and management, real estate, teaching and global trade. The Medical University of South Carolina takes an especially hard hit with Sanford vetoing $7 million, including a boost to the overall budget the hospital wanted for advanced training of doctors in specialized areas, including cancer and heart treatment. MUSC also would lose $600,000 for the Hollings Cancer Center and $575,000 to cover indigent patient care. Sanford said the budget "creates what amounts to an unconstitutional deficit" because of the projected shortfalls facing the state departments of Education and Corrections. The state is required to have a balanced budget by law, and legislators argue that it is. The Education Department faces an extra $1 million in fuel costs every time diesel prices jump 8 cents, and is already anticipating a deficit of at least $10 million. Meanwhile, the Corrections Department could potentially face a deficit of $8 million. "This level of funding for Corrections is unacceptable because the agency performs the essential function of housing and rehabilitating our state's inmate populations," Sanford wrote. "Inadequate funding will eventually lead to prisons being closed, inmates being furloughed and prison security being diminished." The House could take up the vetoes as early as today or could wait until next week. The Legislative session ends June 5.
Reach Yvonne Wenger at ywenger@postandcourier.com or 803-799-9051.
|
Posted by Early on May 29, 2008 at 8:28 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Hey Gov, please send some this way to
The Early fund
Care of me
In my pocket SC
Thanks
Posted by NotProvincial on May 29, 2008 at 9:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Notice the following vetoes:
$575,000 to cover indigent patient care;
$4 million, to hire and staff public defender offices;
$1.1 million, indigent defense;
$1 million, to cover indigent defense costs;
$3 million, grants to 13 rural hospitals;
$250,000, MUSC's rural dentist program.
It is indisputable that these represent easy targets that do not have voices that compel executive or legislative ears to listen. Impoverished and rural citizens are again getting the shaft from government.
Posted by Tammie on May 29, 2008 at 9:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"--$4.5 million for high-speed data connection at Clemson University, the University of South Carolina and MUSC."
Geez..now we have to continue to use this fossil system we have. <sarcasm on> Thanks Gov! <sarcasm off>
Posted by Charles_Town on May 29, 2008 at 11:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The biggest problem I have with his vetos are the ones in regard to cutting funding for children health care.
Posted by Name_Withheld on May 29, 2008 at 12:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Elitist Sanford in action. You elected him you deserve him.
Posted by zoomru on May 29, 2008 at 1:13 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Governor ...you go! I certainly don't agree with everything; but who does?
Here's a news flash...OUR Government is here to PROTECT...not ...NOT ..PROVIDE!! These indigent care bills he vetoed raise another question? I wonder what percentage of these patients had there whole life to make some phone calls and talk to some insurance agents about there CARE?? How many?? How many were too lazy to call? People need to start looking in the mirror! Not to our Government!
Just to prove my objectivity....Governor Sanford would you please go to www.startech.net and read! We have 18 landfills that are energy to be sold. Chasn Co. runs a 4 Million deficit and Spartanburg has a 1 Million deficit...what deficits are the other counties running? You need to get these utility CEOs by the ears and work up a grid tie-in plan in the next 4 months. Then use that energy to power an elevated statewide mag-lev mass transit sysytem. Or maybe ...you can march around to all firestations in this state and use some of this money to ensure there is not another CHARLESTON 9 fiasco! Do we have an implemetation plan with scheduled build-out for a mass transit system somewhere over there at SC-DOT?? I sure wouldn't want property owners to be the last to know. Stop letting these newspapers in the state take all our elected officials to the woodshed. We need to know what good and bad things they are doing without having to GUESS based on different stories running in different newspapers in the state?!
Looks like CIEPS and DAVIS are knee deep....
http://www2.beaufortgazette.com
/story/20488#comment-52188
Sincerely, Philip C. Branton zoomru@yahoo.com SC Governor 2010