Dorchester 2 school budget plan could raise taxes for businessesBy Dave Munday (Contact)
The Post and Courier
Tuesday, May 20, 2008
SUMMERVILLE — Dorchester County Council on Monday heard a school budget request that could raise taxes for businesses and gave second-reading approval to extending the moratorium on major new residential developments. Dorchester District 2 officials want council to approve a 10 percent budget increase. The $143 million school budget is $13.7 million more than last year. To fund it, the county would have to collect an additional $7.6 million from businesses, according to the presentation, which council heard without action. County Finance Director Lee Moulder said he has not yet calculated whether a commercial tax increase would be necessary to raise the extra money. It's possible the county's growth could raise the money without a tax increase, Council Chairman Larry Hargett said. The numbers will become clearer as council finalizes the budget, which must be approved by the end of June, he said. The school budget does not include any owner-occupied residential property taxes from the county, thanks to a change in state law. Most of the extra money the district is asking for would be spent on trying to keep more at-risk students in school, as well as buying another eight mobile classrooms to handle growth, Schools Superintendent Joe Pye said. "We're offering a bare-bones budget," Pye said. The district projects 650 new students next year, compared with 900 to 1,000 a year the last several years. In other business Monday, council voted 6-1 to give second- reading approval to extending the moratorium. Chris Murphy voted against it. Council passed the six-month moratorium in December, and it expires June 10. Council is moving to extend it another 120 days. It applies to residential developments of at least 10 units in Dorchester District 2, which includes the Summerville area. Council plans a public hearing before the final vote June 2. Reach Dave Munday at 745-5862 or dmunday@postand courier.com. |
Article tools |
|
Notice about comments: Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here. |
Comments
This article has 3 comment(s)
Posted by Slick50 on May 20, 2008 at 7:41 a.m. (Suggest removal)
With the state graduation rate around 65 percent, how can you justify raising the school budget by $13.7 million? Throwing money at the problem is NOT the solution. As a taxpayer, I have to take a hard look at my expenses and cut out the fluff to balance my budget.
Posted by rocketscientist on May 20, 2008 at 11:42 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Slick50--
All of the "fluff" is cut out of the proposed budget. Dorchester 2 is trying to improve its graduation rate with several new programs and opportunities for its "at-risk" students. Look at what Dorchester 2 spends per student compared to other SC districts.
Posted by feb251939 on May 21, 2008 at 9:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
[raise taxes for businesses]
What this means is higher taxes on the purchasing public, the businesses just pass the higher cost on us, as usual.