Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Tariff suspensions debated

Rep. Brown fights to suspend taxes on chemicals; some question lawmaker's motivation in waiving fees

The Post and Courier
Sunday, May 18, 2008


Henry Brown

The Post and Courier

Henry Brown

Tariff suspenders

U.S. Rep. Henry Brown has put in a large number of bills to suspend import taxes on various chemicals, compared with the more than 100 other colleagues who have made similar requests:

Representative District Bills

1) Howard Coble (R-NC) 49

2) Ellen Tauscher (D-CA) 47

3) Dan Burton (R-IN) 42

4) Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO) 28

5) Kenny Hulshof (R-MO) 23

6) Henry Brown (R-SC) 22

6) (tie) Bob Inglis (R-SC) 22

8) Tim Murphy (R-PA) 21

9) Lacy Clay (D-MO) 20

10) Mel Watt (D-NC) 18

Note: As of May 13.

With little fanfare or public debate, First District Rep. Henry Brown has fought to suspend tariffs on more than 20 chemicals made overseas, saving four coastal companies thousands of dollars. However, the overall practice is drawing increased scrutiny from domestic manufacturers and watchdog groups.

Slightly more than 100 of Brown's colleagues in the House of Representatives have put in similar requests to suspend tariffs, although Brown ranks as one of the top lawmakers to participate in the practice. Six other representatives have matched or topped his number of requests.

Brown said he seeks suspensions only for goods that aren't made in the United States and mostly to help companies in South Carolina. To him, it's another form of constituent service.

"If there's somebody who objected to it, nobody has raised a flag to me," he said. "This has been going on for 20 years. I found the process here when I arrived. We decided to continue that same process."

Tariff suspensions have been a relatively ignored phenomena in Washington, but in recent years, a growing number of people have begun to scrutinize who is asking for breaks and who is benefiting in the end. When the tariff suspension bill hits the floor this summer, there could be more eyes on it than ever before.

And that sits well with some government watchdogs, who question whether seeking specific tariff breaks for certain products is creating an unnecessary complexity that benefits only lobbyists, lawyers and those who support them.

How it works

Congress has the right to waive tariffs up to $500,000 for any particular product, and about 20 years ago, it began bundling dozens, even hundreds of these requests into a big bill that could attract enough votes, said Steve Ellis, vice president of the independent watchdog group Taxpayers for Common Sense.

"It was a classic logrolling exercise," Ellis said. "If you can get 300 members of Congress, well then you've got a majority and everybody's happy and everybody gets

along. That's what has been happening with this bill. Unfortunately, it purports to be a very transparent process, but it's not been a very transparent process."

The House Ways and Means Committee is collecting tariff suspension proposals and could send out a single bill wrapping them all together by this summer.

Tariffs are meant to protect domestic manufacturers from cheaper chemicals made abroad. Globalization has led to fewer U.S. manufacturing jobs and more chemical production elsewhere.

Companies that import foreign-made goods for their U.S. operations rely on tariff suspensions to save money.

"It's really an effort to preserve a competitive edge and keep plants operating here in the Lowcountry," said Philip Wiegreffe, head of business operation and manufacturing for Lanxess Corp., which employs 75 manufacturing workers in Berkeley County's industrial Bushy Park.

Company officials asked Brown to propose a bill that would waive the tariff on 4-aminodiphenylamine, a liquid made in Europe. It strengthens tire rubber, prolonging the tire's life, Wiegreffe said.

The company bought the chemical from a Louisiana plant before it shut down a few years ago. Since then, Bushy Park workers have had to import it.

The proposed tariff suspension would save the facility about $500,000 each year.

Most of Brown's proposals would benefit another Bushy Park company, Symrise Inc. of Germany.

Company officials requested tariff suspensions on obscure chemicals like methyl cinnamate and Frescolat MGA.

Local workers mix those chemicals and ship them to other manufacturing companies, which use them to flavor sauces, scent perfumes and give beverages their citrus, vanilla or fruity taste, Symrise spokeswoman Katja Derow said .

The total annual savings from the proposals would amount to $1.2 million. That money likely would be used to buy new equipment and improve infrastructure at the company's Bushy Park and New Jersey facilities, she said.

Rhodia Inc., a French company that employs 150 at its Charleston Neck area facility, asked Brown to suspend the tax on sodium hypophosphite, a white powder made in China that is used in nickel plating.

Workers mix the powder with water to different concentrations before shipping it to customers elsewhere, Rhodia spokesman David Klucsik said. It's a small part of what the local plant does, he added, estimating that the waived taxes on the chemical have saved the company slightly less than $200,000 in the last two years.

"It certainly helps keep Rhodia competitive overall," he said.

Metglas Inc., based in Japan, also asked Brown to suspend the tariff on chemicals that are used at its metallic glass alloy production facility in Conway.

Company officials from the local operations stressed that, as long as U.S. companies aren't already making the chemicals, there's little harm done, and Brown agreed.

"These are products that aren't made in the United States, so we don't have any competition between these imports and domestic products," he said. "That's the reason we suspend tariffs, so these products could be made and be competitive here in the domestic market."

Who is harmed?

The American Manufacturing Trade Action Coalition is one group that works to ensure that domestic companies aren't hurt. Group representatives carefully sift through the database of proposed bills every two years, ready to object if a conflict arises, spokesman Lloyd Wood said.

The group doesn't oppose any of the bills Brown has proposed. However, Wood said that the complicated tariff suspension bill is a result of trade policies in recent decades that have led to a loss in manufacturing jobs.

The process wouldn't be as popular, he said, if so many U.S. jobs had not shifted overseas amid a globalizing economy.

"We've got a climate where people aren't encouraged to invest in manufacturing," he said.

The process also can leave small businesses out of the game.

Smaller companies might not be able to afford lobbyist manpower in Washington to make similar requests. And while government staffers check with major U.S. chemical producers to make sure that suspensions don't affect chemicals made at their own operations, smaller chemical operations might be harder to find.

That's what happened four years ago to Robert Kelly, who owns a chemical production company in Connecticut.

Brown wanted to waive the tariff for a chemical called Vulkanox ZMB, which Lanxess workers use to strengthen tire materials in Bushy Park.

Kelly told The Washington Post that he was lucky to have been tipped off by a colleague about the suspension request, which could have shut down his facility.

Lanxess officials asked to suspend the tariff on the chemical again this year but missed the deadline, a representative from Brown's office said.

Other options

Brown, who faces a primary challenge June 10, isn't the only member of South Carolina's congressional delegation who has sought suspensions. Fourth District Rep. Bob Inglis is seeking to suspend the duty on certain hot feed extruding equipment used to make tires.

The Republican's district includes a Michelin plant that imports manufacturing equipment not available for purchase in the United States, said Price Atkinson, Inglis' communications manager.

"This helps companies located in the U.S. to keep jobs in the U.S., rather than move offshore, where equipment and raw materials may be available duty-free," Atkinson said.

In general, Inglis applies the same criteria to judge tariff suspensions as earmarks: There must be a federal interest, an economic development component and local matching funds, Atkinson said.

U.S. House Majority Whip James Clyburn, D-S.C., has not sought a tariff suspension so far, but he's not necessarily opposed to the idea.

"Any request I would make for tariff relief would come as the result of a need presented to me by a constituent or business in my district," he said. "I do not recall ever receiving such a request. I am not opposed to requesting tariff relief if the circumstances had merit."

Brown said his seeking suspensions is akin to his intervening on behalf of other South Carolina companies involved in trade disputes.

"We want to be actually sure there's a fair trade practice on any corporate citizens we have," he said.

Brown said it would be different if U.S. companies made similar products.

"If there was a market in the U.S., then we wouldn't be asking for relief for a foreign company," he said. "We feel like we acted in the best interest of our constituents that worked there. We have no other agenda."

Told he was No. 7 among all congress members who have requested suspensions, Brown said he is not a member of the Ways and Means Committee, which oversees the suspension bills, and isn't familiar with the big picture.

"To be quite honest, until you called, I gave it no consideration," he said. "I just thought it was something that needed to be done and we did it."

A Better Way?

Before the federal government created the income tax in the early 20th century, most all of its operations were funded by tariffs on foreign goods.

Today, customs and duties make up less than 2 percent of the budget. But government watchdogs say the problem with tariff suspensions isn't the lost money as much as the process.

"When you look at it, it's probably not a huge dollar amount, but you can't measure cost just in dollars and cents, even though that might sound strange coming from a budget watchdog," Ellis said. "If there's concern about corruption and pay to play, then it does add up."

For instance, Brown has received a $500 donation from the American Chemistry Council, whose members include some companies that he has helped with tariffs. Brown said he wasn't aware of the donation, adding, "I don't know there's a connect."

Ellis said Congress' recent earmark reform included tariff suspensions, making them easier to track. He predicted this year's bill will get more scrutiny than ever, "and that begets more interest if you start finding things that are in a gray area or have a campaign contributor tied into it. I wouldn't say that's the case in Rep. Brown's requests, but I wouldn't be surprised if that's the case of some others in here. It begets calls for reform."

Not all the suspensions are controversial. Ellis said Rep. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore., has bragged about saving his city money by getting tariffs waived on light rail cars imported from the Czech Republic, lessening the cost to the Portland, Ore., transit system.

"I don't think there was any nefarious business going on there," Ellis added.

But on the other hand, it can be difficult to sift through the requests — much like it's difficult to sift through the ever-expanding federal tax code.

"Anytime you have a very complex process in the shadows, you invite corruption and some of the seamier things that grow in the petri dish in the shadows," Ellis said.

"It's really good for the lawyers that work on this, the lobbyists that work on this and the politicians who want to get contributions from all of the above," he added, "but is the public really being served, as opposed to looking at it and saying 'Why don't we cut tariffs across the board?' "

Reach Robert Behre at rbehre@postandcourier.com or 937-5771. Reach Katy Stech at kstech@postandcourier.com or 937-5549.




Article tools




Latest local stories




Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  16 comment(s)

Posted by Thomas1776 on May 18, 2008 at 1:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Yes .. it's time for this clowns face to start appearing more and more in the news with elections coming.

I will never vote for him again.



Posted by Paul on May 18, 2008 at 7:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Another big business handout by an entrenched politician.

He stated when he first ran for office,as our representative, that he has never lost an election. Its time he found out in November that he represents the people, not himself and his personal agenda.



Posted by moonpie on May 18, 2008 at 9:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)

VOTE FOR THE OPPONENT IN EVERY RACE AND SEND A SIGNAL TO ALL OUR POLITIICANS THAT THEY WORK FOR US! LET NO INCUMBENT WIN!



Posted by ConcernedDorchesterCitizen on May 18, 2008 at 10:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Ok, let me get this straight: Henry is against any chance of getting and keeping jobs in the state, we don't care about our enviroment, forget SChip because he doesn't care about poor children, he wants to stay in the war but not care for our wounded vets (presumably because the vet messed up). What is ole' Henry about? Oh I forgot; he is for continuing to screw over the South Carolina residents for the few months he has left!

Henry Brown, the worse congressman in the House.



Posted by carolinadude on May 18, 2008 at 10:16 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I certainly agree with the above comments. This may be about the first time these commenters have almost complete consensus. As to tariffs, Brown's position does not surprise me. I recall that he was for giving Red China "most favored nation" status not long after being elected to Congress which has resulted in the demise of how many thousands of American factories and millions of American jobs. I can hardly find anything in Walmart not made in China. I'm not sure who Brown's sold out to, but it sure isn't the American worker or taxpayer. Brown's ticket home needs to be punched on June 10. I'm for giving this Kathryn Jeanrette from Horry County an opportuntiy.



Posted by ConcernedDorchesterCitizen on May 18, 2008 at 12:11 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Brown "isn't familiar with the big picture." - Boy isn't that the truth!!!!!



Posted by zoomru on May 18, 2008 at 12:19 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Tariff relief? Hmm...obviously all the facts have not been reported. Nevertheless..who's to blame .....Mr Brown. It just galls me to observe how quiet all elected officials have been in the last year on the sofa super store fiasco. Yes..they may have a press release...or pass the buck and say it's a city or county issue; but that is the exact train of thought that is their undoing.
With today's technology...Has Rep Brown closed ONE landfill in this STATE or NATION? Has he been to the demonstration facility in Bristol Conn.? www.startech.net ??Has he talked to SC Rep INGLIS to see what he observed ...and see how they plasmafied ANTARTICA's trash when he was down there? What has this cat done for the State of South Carolina? Does HE have a layout of the IMPLEMENTATION for our state's elevated mass transit system since we still have "visiting" immigrants coming here? Rep Brown...where has your voice been? So long...PIRATE!



Posted by ColdBeer on May 18, 2008 at 2:12 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Mr. Brown said "This has been going on for 20 years. I found the process here when I arrived. We decided to continue that same process."

There's an ignorant statement if I ever heard one. I'm glad our past politicians didn't take this approach when dealing with slavery and women's right to vote.



Posted by stand828 on May 18, 2008 at 5:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Wow! Henry Brown actually did something...



Posted by cinnabar on May 18, 2008 at 5:17 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Memo to all computer enabled Morons...South Carolina companies have to compete with global products, not just stuff made in the USA. For the most part we don't have the union yoke around our company necks, but the corporations we do have need to stay competetive so you all, and your neighbors, can feed your children, and buy your cars, and big screen tvs etc. If we don't look out, some Chinese company will subsidize the chemicals or products made or used in SC and take the business away from your neighbors employer...and you can figure out the rest. My hats off to Rep Brown, he sees the big picture and we need to keep him. Put on your thinking cap, the world is brutal and you need to think this stuff through before drawing uninformed conclusions. This BS of slapping the hands that feed us needs to stop!



Posted by Thomas1776 on May 18, 2008 at 6:30 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Old School. Old Ways. Out of touch. Never can change.

So what else is new?



Posted by ConcernedDorchesterCitizen on May 18, 2008 at 7:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)

memo to shealy - oops i mean cinnabar - guess what - when you ship all of the jobs overseas you can't make any money to buy cheap goods. Guess you and ole' Henry haven't figured it out yet. Guess that is why you'll both be packing your bags come Nov.
No Rep. Brown doesn't see the big picture as he himself admitted. He has been short-sighted when it comes to a lot of things. Education, Jobs, the Enviroment, funding our Vets, the war, and the list goes on and on. If he is such a great leader - why does he have competition this time? I think we need him to debate all of the candidates. Oh, I forgot - the ole' fart can't even speak properly.



Posted by cinnabar on May 18, 2008 at 7:34 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Also, a tariff is a tax that buyers of tires and other stuff eventually pass to the consumer(that is you in Ladson). The tax goes to a bloated 'Jabba the Hut' goverment that loves to tell you what to do, and gives them more money and power. This perpetuates the goverment you loathe. Brown is giving you a break! Bite that hand, Bubba!



Posted by cinnabar on May 18, 2008 at 7:39 p.m. (Suggest removal)

CDC& Thomas...Why don't you suspend running the multinational company you own & operate and run for Congress...you guys got it figured out. I'll vote for you.



Posted by cinnabar on May 18, 2008 at 7:47 p.m. (Suggest removal)

Also, I advocate keeping all jobs in sunny SC so the removal of tarrifs helps that position, CDC. A tarriff is a tax on imports that increases mfg. costs. That hurts goods produced in SC. No tarriff means lower SC manufacturing costs so our goods cost less which makes SC more competetive. BYW, coal & nuclear generation means SCE&G can sell power at a lower cost and also helps our goods compete. Bottom line, we don't have to all work for Hardee's...



Posted by patlabb on May 20, 2008 at 8:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Henry is just old school. Time for Linda to retire him. He does not represent the voters of South Carolina. He represents failed Bush/Republican politics. To heck with the working man.
In November a vote for linda Ketner will be a vote for hard working Americans.




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News






Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)