Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Letters to the Editor

Thursday, May 15, 2008


Fuel savings by shopping Wal-Mart?

The recent opposition to a proposed Wal-Mart Supercenter on James Island was formed by a group of concerned residents called Islanders for Responsible Expansion. To date, IRE has collected more than 6,000 signatures in opposition to the supercenter. This indicates widespread concern.

The land that Wal-Mart tried to buy from the city of Charleston is part of a 20-plus-acre tract of mitigated wetlands. The wetlands are protected to compensate for the initial wetland fill that occurred in 1994. These wetlands and the surrounding buffers serve a vital role in the overall health of the Stono River by removing pollutants from runoff water.

With seven grocery stores already operating on James Island, it should require little fuel to travel to buy groceries. Most residents will drive past several existing grocery stores on their way to a Wal-Mart Supercenter.

If one is concerned about fuel savings, then consider this information: Wal-Mart has the nation's largest private trucking fleet, with more than 7,200 trucks logging more than 900 million miles last year. Wal-Mart consumed more than 6.3 billion gallons of diesel fuel in the U.S. alone in 2007. That number does not take into account the fuel consumed to transport goods from China to the U.S. A single 747 round trip between the U.S. and China consumes almost 100,000 gallons of jet fuel.

One cannot disagree that Wal-Mart usually has lower prices. However, there are many hidden and deferred costs to all of us that result from big-box retailers such as Wal-Mart.

Amy E. Fabri

President, Islanders for

Responsible Expansion

James Island




Article tools





Sponsored Links



Latest local stories

Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  1 comment(s)

Posted by TP on May 19, 2008 at 11:05 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Hey amy, you should really consider other local environmental issues in addition to the hip and trendy 'we hate Wal-mart' deal. You have all these people on the band wagon, yet i have not heard of your group getting involved in other decisions regarding growth, development, etc in Charleston.

If you do not manage to harness some of this local activism for issues other than Wal-Mart, then your motivations will be perceived by many as self-serving and a waste of effort.




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News






Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)