Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Charleston tries to explain how it does things

The Post and Courier
Saturday, May 10, 2008


Side by side

Compare Charleston's proposed standards with the current Secretary of Interior standards here.

Across the United States, dozens of cities have adopted federal standards for working on historic buildings, but when someone suggested Charleston do the same, many bristled at the idea.

It's not just that Charlestonians have a historical legacy of resisting the federal government, though they do. It's also that this city often has been at the vanguard of the nation's preservation movement. Residents here organized to save old buildings many decades before any federal preservation standards were put to paper. And some saw flaws in the federal rules.

So Charleston wrote its own.

The resulting two-page document seems to be winning broad support. The city will know for sure after it holds forum Monday, May 12, on the new guidelines. The city's Board of Architectural Review could adopt them as guidelines as early as Wednesday, May 14.

The new standards get a thumbs up from College of Charleston architectural historian Robert Russell, who has said the federal standards were too inflexible. "It's nice that there's a possibility for back and forth, give and take, instead of someone wielding a heavy hammer, which never has been Charleston's way of doing things," he said.

Reach Robert Behre at 937-5771 or at rbehre@postandcourier.com




Article tools




Latest local stories





Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  0 comment(s)


(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)