Habitat clients could get part of foreclosure sale profits
The Post and Courier
Wednesday, May 7, 2008
A Charleston County foreclosure sale Tuesday involved two homes built by the nonprofit group Charleston Habitat for Humanity but also was unusual because the sale could mean a windfall for the Habitat clients who defaulted on their loans. Both houses on H Street were sold, after spirited bidding, for more than Habitat was owed, which was about $70,000 for each property. As a result, the people who lived in those homes stand to collect the sale proceeds that exceeded the debt and other costs; amounting to around $10,000 for one property and $20,000 for the other, according to Charleston Habitat for Humanity Executive Director Jeremy Browning. Both of the houses were built about eight years ago on land donated by the city. Browning said both families apparently moved out last fall, and he does not know where they are or how to find them. The local Habitat organization does not usually rehabilitate unoccupied properties, and had hoped the homes would be sold. Habitat for Humanity builds low-cost homes for people of limited means, relying heavily upon volunteer labor, and Habitat homeowners in Charleston typically have a no-interest mortgage costing less than $450 a month. Habitat doesn't make a profit when homeowners pay their loans over time, but the organization will gain close to $70,000 on Tuesday's foreclosure sales. That's because Habitat homes carry two mortgages, one that represents the cost of building the home and a second mortgage representing the remaining market value of the property at the time the house is completed. The second mortgage serves to keep people from flipping the homes or borrowing heavily against them, and is forgiven over time, but that mortgage gets paid back if there's a foreclosure. "We'll go forward from here, get the money, and try to figure out how we can best recycle it into the community," Browning said. "We'll probably use it to buy land." Both of the H Street homes were purchased by James Peterson, a King Street merchant and real estate investor.
Katy Stech contributed to this report. Reach David Slade at 937-5552 or dslade@postandcourier.com.
|
Posted by SomeTruthPlease on May 7, 2008 at 7:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
$10k for one, and $20k for the other family? I tend to think that entire families disappearing is usually due to some dysfunction, and I don't think that their 'windfall' would be put to any positive use. If I foreclose on my home, and the sale brings an amount greater than the payoff, do I get to keep it? How about this...go back to the days those homes were built, and divide that money between the "volunteers"..or, use the money to purchase another piece of property.
Posted by Early on May 7, 2008 at 8:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
What ever is legal for all should be done.
Posted by proudmomma on May 7, 2008 at 10:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)
How would the people that were living there get the money if no one knows "where they are or how to find them"?
Posted by AHLeland on May 7, 2008 at 10:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I'm with you, proudmomma. If I remember yesterday's article correctly, the residents defaulted and left. The houses were boarded up. They walked away from a great opportunity that was handed to them. The Habaitat people even said that had the families contacted them, they would have worked something out so that they could keep their homes. Let that $30,000 go to help more deserving families.
Posted by Edwin435 on May 7, 2008 at 12:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
No money for them! That is stupid. Reward those who didn't pay their bills...put the money in a account to help others that want a place to live and are deserving of a little help...like paying closing costs.
Posted by ashleyatwork on May 7, 2008 at 1:07 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Habitat needs to get smart and close this loophole. Volunteers are not donating precious time and $$ to help dead beats.
Posted by eyfigueroa on May 7, 2008 at 1:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
w-w-w-w-w-what?!?!?!?!
I wish ANY of those deadbeats show up with their hands out.
oopps! too late.
Posted by geekguy2008 on May 7, 2008 at 3:42 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I very much agree...habitat people are "animals" because we only refer to "habitat" when we talk about wildlife....and deadbeats that get homes for next to nothing.