Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Senate panel considers water plan

The Post and Courier
Wednesday, March 19, 2008


COLUMBIA— How much water does it takes to make a stream a stream? A state Senate committee might well decide that today.

The Senate Agriculture and Natural Resources Committee today will debate for a third time a proposed state water plan, a law that would create a permitting system and set withdrawal limits for most large surface water users.

The fight is over minimum stream flow, the least amount of water that must be left in a stream as water is drawn down for commercial use.

Having a permit plan has become critical with water use increasing and recent severe droughts causing some rivers to run almost dry.

State resource agencies want to set a minimum flow that would vary from 20 percent to as much as 60 percent more than a stream's mean low flow, mimicking seasonal natural flow to assure the health of river habitats. Conservation groups support that.

The biggest water users — power plants, industries, water treatment plants, large farms — are pushing for the mean low flow plus 20 percent year-round. That's enough to assure seasonal variation, they say.

"The floods, the rains, the total amount of water in that river varies as it is. The notion that the bill will allow us to pull all the rivers down to 20 percent doesn't make a lot of common sense," said Eddie Twilley, a MeadWestvaco lobbyist, who emphasized he was speaking for a group of business interests. The varied-flow regulation "is too conservative, ultra-conservative, just overly protective of the resource."

A vote on the manufacturers' proposal was postponed last week by Sen. Chip Campsen, R-Isle of Palms, and other committee members.

Campsen said river ecosystems are a state heritage, and recreational and fishing businesses are an economic engine.

"It's not for the sake of some salamander somewhere. It's about whether when we drop a boat in a river is it going to hit the sand? It's about preserving a way of life," he said. "It's not about shutting down existing industry. It's about allocating uses in the future. It's not an infinite fountain."

Reach Bo Petersen at 745-5852 or bpetersen@postandcourier.com




Article tools




Latest local stories




Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  0 comment(s)


(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News






Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)