Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Shift to landfills creates dilemma

Private companies must find alternative disposal method

The Post and Courier
Sunday, March 2, 2008


Private haulers and contractors along with several cities and towns are scrambling to figure out how they'll get rid of trash in the future.

Charleston County is reshuffling how waste is disposed with its plans to start burying all household waste in dumps instead of burning trash at the incinerator plant in North Charleston.

Subsequently, private haulers and contractors soon won't be allowed to dump construction debris at county landfills so that the dumps will last longer.

While western and southern areas of the county could be impacted by changes in construction waste disposal, areas east of the Cooper also could feel a pinch in disposing of everyday household trash.

The extent of the impact is yet to be seen. Communication about future options plays a role, too.

Every county resident will be affected.

The pressure is on

Russ Perkins has four months to figure out what his waste removal company, Nature's Calling, will do when Charleston County stops accepting construction and demolition debris after June 30.

The news blindsided Perkins. "I didn't know anything about it until it came out in the paper," he said. His company supplies portable restrooms in addition to hauling waste.

Perkins opened Nature's Calling in 1996. His company serves more than 1,000 customers.

In July, when the county's Bees Ferry landfill stops accepting construction waste, Perkins figures he'll have to pay more for gasoline and to maintain his fleet because workers will have to go elsewhere. His payroll also might increase.

"It's going to be a lot," Perkins said. "It's actually going to end up costing whoever is the homeowner building a new house."

Last year, the Bees Ferry landfill took in approximately 85,000 tons of construction trash.

Perkins and Brian Wintjen, general manager of Nature's Calling, say construction firms doing projects in West Ashley and on the sea islands likely would have to pay haulers more because the waste would have to be carried

farther away.

"Everything that we have west and south of Charleston that was going to Bees Ferry, who knows where it's going to go?" Wintjen said. "It's probably going to double the time to get it there. ... We're going to have to increase charges for our services, which trickles down to everybody."

Wintjen said they currently pay $3.25 a gallon to fill up the 80-gallon tanks on their trucks. The trucks get three to four miles a gallon, he said.

Private haulers could drop off at the Fennell Container Co. operation in North Charleston but have limited other options — either Dorchester County's Oakridge landfill or Berkeley County's dump in Moncks Corner.

Bees Ferry is the most expensive dump, charging $30 a ton, but Perkins and Wintjen argue that its proximity and the fact that it is well-maintained make up for the price.

Perkins said Fennell Container "would pretty much have a monopoly, being the closest one," when the county's landfill closes. Fennell Container recently increased its rates by $1. Nature's Calling now pays $28 a ton.

Phillip Ford, executive vice president of the Charleston Trident Homebuilders Association, said he hasn't heard an uproar about the county no longer taking construction waste after June, but "that definitely will impact the cost of doing business."

"Maybe word's not out there yet. There could be some concerns," Ford said.

'Time is money'

Charleston County Council decided last month to stop using its incinerator, built in the late 1980s. County staff crunched the numbers and found it to be the least costly option.

The incinerator, located on Shipyard Creek Road, converts 230,000 tons of trash a year, or 80 percent of the county's garbage, into smoke, steam and a thick black ash. Instead of burning trash, the county wants to bury all of its garbage at the Bees Ferry Road landfill and a future dump near Adams Run, which should open by 2024.

Every household is charged $99 for solid waste disposal. The county charges rental and commercial property owners more.

Residents living east of the Cooper in Mount Pleasant, Isle of Palms and Sullivan's Island might pay additional costs in municipal taxes, because those areas will have to deal with longer rides, and subsequently higher gas costs and more wear and tear on trucks.

Donnie Pitts, Isle of Palms public works director, estimated the switch to strictly dumping at Bees Ferry would triple his annual costs because of more manpower and farther distances.

Mount Pleasant is paying a consultant $8,000 to study the impact of the incinerator's closing. Officials from the three island governments are hoping the study might offer feasible options for them to collaborate on a transfer station, a centrally located place where municipalities can dump garbage and larger trucks can haul it to the landfills in western Charleston County.

Isle of Palms City Administrator Linda Tucker said they weren't completely caught off guard. "We heard rumblings that this might be coming," she said. "Sure, would we've liked for there to have been more planning time? Yes."

While the county does plan to eventually build a transfer station, county officials haven't figured out where it would go.

"We don't want to duplicate efforts," Tucker said. "But at the same time we don't want to wait on something and then sort of be caught in the lurch. ... Time is money."

Reach Tenisha Waldo at twaldo@postandcourier.com or 937-5744.




Article tools




Latest local stories




Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  8 comment(s)

Posted by pacomarj on March 2, 2008 at 1:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)

So who is actually going to benefit from this decision? The County is saving while it is costing the taxpayers more. What is the County going to do with the money they are supposedly saving?



Posted by majorjohnson on March 2, 2008 at 7:21 a.m. (Suggest removal)

You haven't seen anything yet. This is actually part of the "greening" effect. They are shutting down the incinerator because of greenhouse effects and pollution, more greenhouse than pollution since it's actually pretty clean. Of course, now the greenhouse gasses will come from trucks instead. It also supplies electricity, which will now come off the grid instead. Eventually it will probably domino into multiple problems, which will be blamed on the businesses and municipalities who have to raise prices rather than the county.



Posted by moonpie on March 2, 2008 at 8:13 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Oh well I guess the county will have to stop building now? Don't issue anymore building permits if your not able to take that trash from the construction.



Posted by newsreader on March 2, 2008 at 10 a.m. (Suggest removal)

It's RIDICULOUS that Charleston County is going along this path. Instead of eliminating over 75% of our solid waste and providing energy (a bonus) through incineration, they are going to fill the earth with more trash, leaving no other choice but to turn undeveloped land into more landfill space. In addition, this plan makes trash disposal more expensive to taxpayers.



Posted by jammer on March 2, 2008 at 10:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)

beyond the cost problems I sure am glad I don't live on beesferry rd

all those brand new neighborhoods are going to literally stink to high heaven now, and bird crap will be all over everyone's roof as the flocks that used to live there many years ago return

I remember before they built any of those neighborhoods you could smell the trash/garbage miles away

you could also see the thousands of birds flying in the sky several miles before you got there, they eat all the maggots that will make the ground do the wave

and to think, I have an x-wife that lives within a cpl of miles of there... what karma... lol



Posted by rollo on March 2, 2008 at 10:37 a.m. (Suggest removal)

This could tie into the story about turtles and dolphins being poisoned by contamination from fabric treatments. I don't know that incinerating these chemicals is better than burying them, but it seems they might break down more readily in the incinerator than in the landfill.



Posted by ffwife on March 2, 2008 at 7:53 p.m. (Suggest removal)

The contract for the incinerator was with the shipyard back when it was open. The "steam" they were selling hasn't been used for years - since the shipyard closed. However, the contract was still in place and the government was still paying for this steam even though it wasn't being used. Now the contract is coming to and end and there is no one there to renew it with. So, they choose to close it down because they aren't generating revenue any longer - just running up cost.

Oh yeah, "dumps" are illegal. All the references to "dumps" in this article is out of place. A landfill is an "engineered facilty" that requires a lot more work than a "dump."



Posted by lowcntryman on March 3, 2008 at 8:08 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Sounds like everyone is wondering the same thing. Why would the County choose a direction that has such a significant impact across so many different areas of operations? Has anyone actually seen smoke coming from the incinerator? As a driver, I pass it a thousand times a day and never see "smoke" coming from it. My son went on a tour of the incinerator with his class. Maybe we all need to go request a tour of the incinerator and the landfill and see what the real deal is. As citizens, we have a right, and a voice.




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News






Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)