Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Compact would ease transfers for military kids

The Post and Courier
Monday, June 23, 2008


Melissa Gustafson sprays sunscreen on her son Sam, 7, as his brother Jordan, 12, waits his turn at the back of their mother's SUV at their North Charleston home Tuesday. They were headed to the Isle of Palms beach. The children will find out whether they have to move to another city when their father returns from his military deployment. Proposed legislation could make their lives easier with any future school transfers.

Mic Smith
The Post and Courier

Melissa Gustafson sprays sunscreen on her son Sam, 7, as his brother Jordan, 12, waits his turn at the back of their mother's SUV at their North Charleston home Tuesday. They were headed to the Isle of Palms beach. The children will find out whether they have to move to another city when their father returns from his military deployment. Proposed legislation could make their lives easier with any future school transfers.

COLUMBIA — Twelve-year-old Jordan Gustafson already sacrifices a lot for his country: He gives up his dad on his birthdays and gets caught between being a kid and being the man of the house.

Now, Jordan is about to find out if he's going to have to move from his North Charleston home. A push is under way, though, to make military transfers easier on kids such as Jordan and his sister and brother, Abby, 10, and Sam, 7.

"We can't choose where we get orders," the children's mother, Melissa Gustafson, said. The family is expecting to find out what is in store for them when her husband, Isaac, returns in about eight weeks from a six-month deployment.

The Department of Defense is working with all states on a compact that would require schools to more seamlessly place children of active-duty military parents in special classes and make sure spots are open for them on sports teams and clubs if they've got the skills, among a long list of provisions.

Most children in military families attend between six and nine schools before they graduate. To address what they can, the Defense Department along with the Council of State Governments began work on the compact in July 2006.

So far, eights states have endorsed the plan through legislation, a voluntary action, and five more are pending. South Carolina's Military Base Task Force recently gave a nod to the compact and agreed to support efforts to make changes to the state's laws.

Advocates have the summer and fall to build support for the compact here before the Legislature reconvenes in January. One of the lawmakers would then need to file a bill.

Rep. Joe Daning, R-Goose Creek, said the concept sounds like something he could get behind. He serves on the House Medical, Military, Public and Municipal Affairs Committee and is director of work force and military programs at Trident Technical College. He said he can recognize the importance of initiatives designed to help the state's military men and women.

"At first blush, I am totally supportive," Daning said. "We need to support our military, and this is a good way to do it."

Elsa Summers, a community readiness consultant at the Charleston Air Force Base's Airman and Family Readiness Center, said transferring schools can mean a variety of headaches for military families, especially when the transfers come in the middle of the school year.

"South Carolina would be really leading if they were to go ahead and endorse the interstate compact," she said.

The compact will help facilitate opportunities for military children when it comes to sports and magnet schools, she said. Many times, military children miss out on those chances.

Having high school-aged children adds a whole other dynamic, Summers said. They can run into trouble when it comes to transferring credits and completing course work on time.

The compact has a special focus on building flexibility when it comes to graduation requirements, such as waiving certain courses if similar ones are completed in other states. For instance, if a student took state history in Georgia, he would not be required to take South Carolina state history in order to graduate.

Unlike the average military family who moves about once every two to three years, the Gustafsons have been in the Charleston area for eight years. Isaac Gustafson is assigned to the Charleston Air Force Base.

"We've been very blessed," Melissa Gustafson said.



The compact

The U.S. Department of Defense is looking to South Carolina and all the states to put in place an interstate compact to help military children when they have to transfer schools. It would apply to children of active-duty military personnel.

The compact would:

--Allow schools to temporarily use unofficial records to prevent any delays in getting children in accelerated or special-needs classes, for example, and set timelines for the transfer of official records, including immunization data.

--Require schools to be flexible when it comes to making determinations about course placement and graduation requirements.

--Grant children additional excused absences surrounding a parent's deployment.

--Provide opportunities for children to participate in extracurricular activities, as long as they qualify.

--Give enforcement power to an interstate commission to make sure schools are honoring the compact.

"Passage of this interstate compact will have a lasting, positive impact on our military families," David S.C. Chu, undersecretary of defense for personnel and readiness, said in a statement. "Quality education is a primary quality-of-life concern. In fact, education is so important that it directly impacts military recruitment, satisfaction with assignments, readiness, and ultimately, retention."

Reach Yvonne Wenger at 803-799-9051 or ywenger@postandcourier.com.




Article tools




Latest local stories




Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  12 comment(s)

Posted by palmettotree on June 23, 2008 at 7:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)

That sounds great the kids need it. Too bad, it wasn't in place when I was military brat.



Posted by Sandy37 on June 23, 2008 at 7:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I think it would be interesting if it were known publically just how much government funding each school gets for teaching the military children. Whenever my sons were out of school, the school had to know immediately why, because they lost funds every day they were out. I often wondered if how much funding they got effected how much the rest of Charleston had to pay in taxes for schools.



Posted by theronce on June 23, 2008 at 7:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)

As a mb myself for 8 years, I went to 4 schools and did not seem to have any problem. Other than missing some friends, I found it exciting, and I thought everyone did that. My Ga. history substituted for SC history too back in 1965.



Posted by ColdBeer on June 23, 2008 at 7:56 a.m. (Suggest removal)

While I agree that we need to properly support the military, I don't see this as an issue. My dad did 21 years in the Navy and then I did 20 years myself. Transferring schools never caused a hardship for me or my kids. None of us ever had problems getting in schools, in the bands, on the teams. There was never an issue. Personally, I think the exposure to different parts of the country, exposure different cultures, and the experience of making new friends is a huge educational benefit.



Posted by Hey_U_Guys on June 23, 2008 at 8:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Man. That sounds nice. I was a military brat for 16 years. Ack. I think I attended 9 schools. My dad was in the Navy for 21 years and I almost joined myself. But when I thought about what my children would have to deal with, I decided against it.



Posted by forget on June 23, 2008 at 9:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)

We moved 11 times in 17 years when my father was in the military. We didn't need any "programs" to help us along. It builds a personal strength that they can use their whole lives. My sisters and I didn't have any problems going away to college, transfering with husband's new jobs, etc. We are all very independent. I didn't have any qualms about taking my daughter out of the country on vacation, just her and I.
Just my opinion, but children of military personnel have a strength that can't be learned in a classroom or the playground.



Posted by lou9 on June 23, 2008 at 10:12 a.m. (Suggest removal)

I agree that we should do more for our men and women in the armed forces but the DOD ought to be footing the bill for this plan, not the citizens of South Carolina.



Posted by ColdBeer on June 23, 2008 at 10:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Even if the DOD foots the bill, we'll be paying. The DOD is funded by taxes.



Posted by Charles_Town on June 23, 2008 at 11:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Sounds like a good plan to help improve what could be stressful challenges for some families.



Posted by Jane on June 23, 2008 at 3:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)

God bless our men and women in the military! God bless the military families!! Thank you! Thank you!! Thank you!!!



Posted by My_50Cents_Worth on June 23, 2008 at 7:36 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I agree, forget!



Posted by Sandy37 on June 24, 2008 at 12:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)

There are only a small number of areas that military families are transfered from/to. It would be wonderful if these area schools would match the school curriculum so the children would be at about the same place in their education every time they were transferred. Charleston was not equal to Connecticut schools, even though when I found out we were being transferred my research told me West of the Ashley had the better schools. We lived there 7 years, then we went to Honolulu, which was about as bad as S.C. The Government does fund the schools to cover any additional expense of Military Children.




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)