New law limits where sex offenders live
Gov. Sanford signs bill into law Monday to keep criminals away from schools
By JIM DAVENPORT
Associated Press
Tuesday, June 17, 2008
COLUMBIA — Sex offenders won't be able to live within 1,000 feet of schools, day care centers or playgrounds under legislation Gov. Mark Sanford signed into law Monday night. Sanford applauded the bill, but knocked a provision that lightens penalties for sex offenders who don't tell sheriffs where they live. It was one of 29 bills the Legislature left behind when it adjourned two weeks ago. Sanford had to act on that stack before midnight. "We believe this is a commonsense measure for safeguarding our state's children," Sanford wrote, noting that local governments had passed a patchwork of laws on their own and the state needed to be consistent. "We also believe this legislation will deter sex offenders from relocating from neighboring states to South Carolina. The bill says convicts can't live within 1,000 feet of schools, day care centers or playgrounds. It doesn't apply to people who already lived within that limit before the measure became law. And it doesn't force newly convicted people to move. The bill also changes a three-year-old law that imposed a 90-day jail sentence when sex offenders fail to register with a sheriff or report an address change. It allows a $500 fine and no more than 30 days in jail. And, unlike the old law, the change would allow judges to suspend those penalties. State Sen. Brad Hutto, D-Orangeburg, said he offered the change at the request of prosecutors who believe the lesser punishments will be assessed more quickly and without jamming up their calendars. The Legislature left intact repeat-offender penalties on the registration law. A second offense brings a mandatory one-year prison term that judges can't suspend. A third offense brings five years with a minimum of three years in prison. Sanford said he understood what prosecutors wanted, but he said "the good of the bill is offset" by that change. He said he relied on promises from the bill's sponsors and others that the Legislature would increase the penalty next year. Sanford also vetoed a handful of bills, including one that would have added special penalties for assaults on sport officials and coaches. "It is a sorry commentary on society at large when a bill like this even needs to be debated, but it does, given the fact that attacks have taken place," Sanford wrote in his veto. While he thinks such attacks are "wrong and deserving of our greatest condemnation and prosecution under the law," Sanford said the bill "sets a dangerous precedent of carving out a special status for coaches and officials that other citizens don't enjoy." Among the other bills Sanford signed: --Limits on how long administrative law judges have to review and decide challenges for environmental permits; and --A $500 fine for parents who let unlicensed children drive. --Sanford also vetoed: --Expanded tax credits for people who redevelop old textile mills; and --An overhaul of state prison laws, mostly because it contained a provision urging the Corrections Department to place inmates closer to their family's homes. The Legislature returns next week to take up Sanford's vetoes and act on compromise legislation worked out in conference committees.
|
Posted by Early on June 17, 2008 at 8:18 a.m. (Suggest removal)
1000 feet, whoop tee do. Should make it 10 miles. This is BS, BS, BS
Posted by ColdBeer on June 17, 2008 at 8:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Sex offenders should not be allowed to live within 1000 feet of planet Earth.
Posted by bigpappapump77 on June 17, 2008 at 8:53 a.m. (Suggest removal)
sanford you are a joke - 1000 feet???
Pansie-ass law with no teeth!, just like our gov!
Posted by 5thGenerationLocal on June 17, 2008 at 9:03 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Why limit where they live? Why not limit their life?
Posted by Tammie on June 17, 2008 at 9:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
1000 feet, please. That is an insult to victims and parents of victims everywhere. Grow some balls Sanford.
Posted by bpwnz on June 17, 2008 at 10:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Looks like its time to upgrade the old binoc's.
Posted by saflagler on June 17, 2008 at 10:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Sanford does not make the laws. All he did was sign this bill to make it a law, which means it must be better than what we had. If we want tougher sex offender laws, as there should be, we need to contact our representatives in the General Assembly. They make the laws, not the Governor. So instead of pissing and moaning about Sanford let's contact our representatives and demand tougher bills!!
Posted by Girleygirl on June 17, 2008 at 11:32 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This is a start and yes it needs to be a lot tougher!
Posted by BigSargeofSC on June 17, 2008 at 4:57 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Why let them out of jail at all? Sex offenders are among the hardest criminal to rehabilitate. Let them roit in jail or on the hangman's noose.
Posted by majorjohnson on June 17, 2008 at 9:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Every state that's tried this has ended up unable to keep track of these people. When you can't legally live anywhere if you register you just don't register. It's a simple minded knee jerk political response, but apparently it goes over big with the simple minded knee jerk masses.
Posted by ms_lady2u on June 18, 2008 at 11:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Newer law....In the jungle, where they belong!!!!!
Posted by jammer on June 18, 2008 at 4:56 p.m. (Suggest removal)
they need to build their own communities seperate from the rest... as long as they aren't one of those on the offender list for getting caught taking a leak or having relations behind a bush where they thought no one could see... lol