Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Traffic calming pits drivers against residents

The Post and Courier
Originally published 01:57 p.m., June 6, 2008
Updated 09:14 p.m., June 6, 2008


The Post and Courier

The population of the Charleston peninsula is around half what it was in the 1950s, but there are more cars and trucks on the streets than ever.

On a typical day, more than 133,000 vehicles cross the Ashley and Cooper rivers and pour down the Neck Area into the peninsula. Some are just passing through, but most are heading to the jobs and schools concentrated downtown.

"In a way it's good, because it shows we're an employment center," said city Department of Transportation Director Hernan Pena.

But one effect of the increasing traffic has been a growing conflict between downtown residents' desire for safe neighborhood streets and the need of workers and visitors to move around the city quickly.

Of all the methods used to calm traffic, the most controversial has been the decision to take some main thoroughfares that were converted to one-way traffic in the 1960s in order to speed traffic, and change them back to two-way streets in an intentional effort to slow traffic down.

Read more in tomorrow's editions of The Post and Courier.




Article tools




Latest local stories





Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  0 comment(s)


(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)