Man jailed for likeness to robber
Richard Jolly tries to move on after mix-up
The Post and Courier
Sunday, June 1, 2008
FBI photo
Surveillance photos from a Dec. 27, 2007, robbery of a BB& T Bank in Sumter show a suspect who bears resemblance to Richard Jolly. At the time, however, Jolly already was jailed at the Charleston County Detention Center, charged with robbing banks in Mount Pleasant and West Ashley on Oct. 25. Authorities have since dropped the charges and think the same man could have been responsible for at least a half dozen robberies in South Carolina.
Melissa Haneline The Post and Courier
Richard Jolly is interviewed in his lawyer's office May 13. His sisters Linda Villeponteaux (center) and Debbie Melton, thinking Jolly was wrongly accused, researched other bank robberies in the region. They contacted law enforcement and finally got legal counsel that got Jolly released and the charges dropped.
Back in October, a friend called Richard Jolly to tell him he looked like the limping man who held up two local banks. The friend had seen a newspaper story with surveillance photos of the suspect. Jolly grabbed a copy of the paper, but he wasn't impressed with the likeness, even if he did have a foot injury and shared some physical traits with the robber. So he didn't mind clearing things up when authorities got in touch with him later that day. Clearing things up, it turns out, has cost Jolly thousands of dollars in legal fees and what he calls months of "living hell" in the Charleston County jail. Early on, Jolly tried to convince a detective he wasn't guilty; he had visited two West Ashley businesses less than a half hour before the first robbery and had been talking on his cell phone during the very time they accused him of holding up the bank. "I told him, 'Sir, I'll take a polygraph test, I'll do anything.' " "They told me if I pleaded guilty, they'd buy me a steak." Jolly was charged with robbing the First Federal Bank at 855 Savannah Highway in West Ashley around 12:30 p.m. Oct. 25, then with holding up the National Bank of South Carolina at Coleman Boulevard and Mill Street in Mount Pleasant about an hour later. Police said that in each case, the man demanded money from a teller but showed no weapon. Suspicion Jolly, who is 54, has spent most of his life in the Charleston area. A master carpenter, he has built local restaurants, and in 2004 he helped set up a temporary holiday skating rink in Marion Square. When times were good, he used to make $75,000 to $90,000 a year. He said he was in between jobs on the day of the robberies, a Thursday. He went to a West Ashley Lowe's home improvement store around noon, then crossed the street to a McDonald's restaurant. A few minutes later, he said he called his ex-wife on his cell phone. Although Jolly said he had done nothing wrong that afternoon, the law had reason to suspect him. His 26-year-old niece, with whom he hadn't been getting along, left police a tip identifying him as the man in the photos, the family said. There was some resemblance, too. But police said the robber had "dirty" or "strawberry" blond hair showing from under a baseball cap, while Jolly's head at the time was shaved bald. The man on surveillance tape also appeared younger, taller and thinner. Possibly contributing to suspicions were blotches on Jolly's criminal record, though he said some aren't as bad as they sound. Grand larceny charges during the past two years stemmed from buying two utility trailers with a price "too good to be true" when, he said, he should have known they were stolen. He said a former partner on contracting jobs took out a breach-of-trust warrant against him last year after a business dispute. The Highway Patrol also charged Jolly with felony driving under the influence in a March 2006 wreck on Bees Ferry Road that caused a Charleston County sheriff's deputy minor injuries, according to past news accounts. Troopers said a can of beer fell from the bed of Jolly's pickup after he crossed the center line and struck the deputy's cruiser. Jolly said he took his eyes off the road momentarily while reaching down to pick up a cell phone and that toxicology tests later came back negative for alcohol. The 9th Circuit Solicitor's Office said the charge is pending. The same wreck injured Jolly's right foot, leaving him some trouble walking. The robber's limp, however, appeared to stem from a problem on his left side. State Law Enforcement Division records also show convictions for fraudulent checks, marijuana possession and numerous traffic violations. None of that, Jolly contends, meant he robbed the bank. Representation Mark Peper, a West Ashley attorney, took the case after Jolly's sisters approached him. Jolly's older sister, Linda Villeponteaux, and his younger sister, Debbie Melton, had been researching the case for hours almost every day since his arrest. Nobody seemed to care that the siblings had unearthed what they considered unassailable proof of his innocence. Melton, whose daughter had left police the tip, said she wondered at first, but was swayed when she looked into things herself. She tracked down the receipt from her brother's trip to Lowe's and tried unsuccessfully to get surveillance footage from the nearby McDonald's. Villeponteaux never thought her brother robbed the banks, certain that he would have been too afraid of getting hurt. She surfed the Internet nightly, researching similar robberies and trying to track down anybody who might help free him. "It was totally destroying us," Villeponteaux said. "We went faithfully every single Sunday to visit him in jail because he was our brother and we believed in him." The sisters contacted Peper in February, feeling that the public defender's office wasn't acting on their information. They said he was the only person who listened. Peper said the public defenders are overworked and might not have had time. Peper checked into Jolly's story and found the sisters' evidence persuasive. But a nightmare scenario kept him awake: Would he have to tell an innocent man to plead guilty so he could avoid the risk of being sentenced to decades in prison? Normally, Peper hires private investigators. But he figured he already had two on the case. Even if Jolly's sisters weren't professionals and had never done legal research before, they had been investigating for months already. "I figured I had the best PIs money could buy." With his client short on funds, Peper paid for a polygraph out of his own pocket. Jolly passed. The robbery suspect couldn't afford to post his $250,000 bail. Even if he did, he wouldn't have been able to leave jail because officials in Orangeburg suspected him in a Oct. 9 bank robbery and put a hold on him. Jail Confinement began to wear Jolly down. He detested the food. He said the starchy fare made it harder for him to control his diabetes, causing him to pass out frequently. He couldn't even spend much time reading because there weren't enough books to go around to all the inmates. "You're whipped, mentally and physically whipped," he said. "You'll do anything to get out." Almost anything. He didn't want to admit to a crime he didn't commit. At trial, he risked a sentence that could put him behind bars for the rest of his life. He said authorities offered him a five-year plea deal, meaning he could have been out in as little as 18 months. "I was so tired; I was burnt out. But I couldn't do it," he said. His sisters and his lawyer kept fighting for him on the outside. Phone records showed Jolly had been talking to his ex-wife on his cell phone during the time of the first robbery, they said. His attorney also handed over the shirt he was wearing that day to show police it wasn't tainted by an exploding dye pack tellers put in the money. Then, a potential break. While Jolly was locked up, a man who looked just like the local robber — down to the distinctive limp — continued a crime spree. He hit banks in Aiken on Nov. 20, in Dothan, Ala., on Dec. 19, and in Sumter on Dec. 27. Jolly's sisters notified authorities as soon as they noticed the pattern. But their brother still languished in jail. The robber hit an Edgefield bank Jan. 3. The following month, the sisters, growing impatient, hired Peper. The attorney, too, was surprised that Jolly remained a suspect, even as similar robberies continued. There was one in Augusta on March 10, another in Orangeburg a month later. And still Jolly remained locked up. Charges dropped Peper doesn't think police checked mounting evidence that excluded Jolly as a suspect. At least not early on. After the robber struck this spring, they began to take notice. In late April, the defense attorney persuaded prosecutors to release Jolly on a personal recognizance bond. Police in Orangeburg also withdrew the hold for the October robbery with which they had planned to charge him. The criminal charges remained until Peper met with 9th Circuit Solicitor Scarlett Wilson on May 8. Wilson agreed to drop the charge. Wilson said her office acted at the request of Mount Pleasant and Charleston police. "As soon as law enforcement realized there had been a mistaken identity, they let us know and we dismissed the charges," she said. Jolly and his attorney wonder why it took six months. A Mount Pleasant police detective said the evidence against Jolly was strong. "Don't think that this was some sketchy, half-hearted identification," Sgt. Blair Martin said of the holdup at the Coleman Boulevard NBSC branch. "There's a whole lot of similarities between Mr. Jolly and the person who robbed that bank." The detective said that Jolly's age, build and facial structure all matched the robber's and that both men had limps. A teller identified Jolly from a lineup. And there was Jolly's niece who left a tip identifying him as the man in the surveillance photos and, Martin said, another relative told police he had been driving on Savannah Highway around the time of the first robbery. Plus, Martin said, Jolly's arrest record shows that he has "a long history of not telling the truth." Charleston police declined numerous requests to comment on the case during the past two weeks. Note to tellers During a recent interview at Peper's office, Jolly was talkative and outgoing, eager to explain what happened to him. Sporting a yellow polo shirt with a pair of sunglasses dangling around his neck, he looked like he was ready for a round of golf. Jolly said that for years he has been a customer of the West Ashley bank that was robbed. "That's the bank I bank with," he said. "Why would I rob the bank I go to?" He said he understands now why some people are reluctant to talk to police: "People won't talk to them because they're scared." The robberies remain unsolved. A representative from the FBI's Columbia office said at least a half dozen holdups in South Carolina, plus others in Alabama and Georgia, are thought to be the work of the same person. Wearing a baseball hat and sunglasses, the middle-aged white man quietly slips a note to tellers. "He's very calm, he's not erratic like the typical bank robber," said Denise Taiste, a public affairs specialist for the FBI in South Carolina. The bureau declined to provide a complete list of related robberies. Taiste said agents think some of the robberies are related but that they aren't sure about all of them. Now Jolly is free. But a stigma remains, like a ball and chain attached to his ankle. He recalled going to a job interview shortly after leaving jail. A woman who had seen the mug shot that ran in the newspaper and on television after his arrest asked, "How'd you get out of jail?" "That pretty much killed the interview right there."
Reach Noah Haglund at nhaglund@postandcourier.com or 937-5550.
|
Posted by whalernut on June 1, 2008 at 5:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Good Luck Jolly, You got a raw deal. Maybe you should go campain with Blair Jennings and beat Scarlet.
Nobody should have to sit in jail that long.
Posted by Mayor on June 1, 2008 at 6:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Sgt. Martin of Mount Pleasant Police is a moron and should be put back on patrol. How can you have "evidence" when he wasn't there?
Shoddy police work again. He'll sue the dog doo out of these police departments.
Posted by Perspective on June 1, 2008 at 7:25 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Sorry Mayor -but they listed some of the evidence. It is called "probable cause". They listed a fair amount of evidence. You can throw out ALL the evidence except the line-up where a bank employee picked him out and you still have probable cause to arrest him.
Could they have followed up more after his arrest? Sure. And obviously they did, subsequently asked for his release...the wheels of justice turn slowly. It sounds to me like the cops did a great job.
I hate to tell you, but if a relative, and bank employee identify you as a bank robber and you are a thief that matches the description, are in the area, and have no job, you are probably going to jail until things get cleared up. Lucky for this guy things got cleared up.
The story about the Grand Larceny charges being because he bought construction trailers at a deal too good to be true doesn't add up. That would be possessing or obtaining stolen property. Grand Larceny charges usually mean you are the one who did the larceny ("taking away").
A Felony DUI that is pending - Haha. It sounds like they would have you believe he was charged with Felony DUI because a beer can fell out of his truck bed. "Toxicology test was negative for alcohol". "Breath analysis" is for alcohol. Toxicology test are usually for drugs. No mention of what the toxicology test actually found in his system. Of course with one or more prior drug convictions mentioned in this article, you do the math on that one?
A business dispute with former partner resulted in "breach of trust" charges? Don't simple business disputes with partners result in "civil court", on the other hand "breach of trust" is a crime that involves a larceny. What? Larceny? (yes, another larceny).
Wow, two people I.D. this subject as being the suspect and the cops have the nerve to arrest him. What is the world coming to? Surely, you know I jest. You can paint the Mona Lisa with poo, but it is still poo.
(Good job to the sisters. With a brother of that caliber most of us would not have bothered.)
Posted by willbillbedamned on June 1, 2008 at 8:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
You think this guy will get any type of compensation for the time he was locked up?? Don't hold your breath. He's lucky tho. If he'd been arrested as a suspected terrorist, he NEVER would have had the chance to clear his name.
Posted by Beerkrugul on June 1, 2008 at 8:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Shouldn't his 26 year old niece be charged with giving false info to police?
Posted by justmyview on June 1, 2008 at 8:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I thought that the police investigators and prosecutors are supposed to arrest and prosecute the most likely suspect and not just any suspect. Regardless of Mr. Jolly's past, sounds as if the police and prosecutors wanted to just close the case at any cost inspite of some very obvious problems with the case
Posted by Toots2U on June 1, 2008 at 9:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)
FYI Toxicology tests are also done to test for alcohol. It is a lot more accurate than these breath analyzers. I know. Some people do not believe the accuracy of these and submit to a blood alcohol test. I used to work in a lab where these were done.
Posted by hunterboy on June 1, 2008 at 9:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Perspective The cops did nothimg right they knew that the bank robber was still robbing banks after jolly was in jail and they did not care they just wanted someone in jail for this so they would look good They never asked for his release until we told them it was going in the news they know they srewed up.do you think they said they were sorry or anything no again if they would have follow up on his where abouts at the time of the robberys he would not have been in jail shooting police work again
Posted by RTC on June 1, 2008 at 9:27 a.m. (Suggest removal)
"They told me if I pleaded guilty, they'd buy me a steak."
Is he telling the truth? If so, that is unbelievable.
Posted by abitskeptical on June 1, 2008 at 9:49 a.m. (Suggest removal)
RTC-no, unfortunately it is not unbelievable.
Defendants often are bullied/threatened with the longest jail sentence possible for the offense with which they have been charged if they insist on their constitutional right to a trial instead of accepting a plea 'deal'.
Posted by RTC on June 1, 2008 at 10:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
abitskeptical, I don't doubt that defendants are threatened, coerced, bullied, or whatever. I was just amazed that they thought that a steak could get them a confession.
If it wasn't such a serious matter it would be comical.
Who in their right mind would relinquish their freedom on the promise of a measley steak?
Posted by abitskeptical on June 1, 2008 at 10:09 a.m. (Suggest removal)
RTC, perhaps they've had some takers over the years?....
But seriously, there are many who have succumbed because they are led to believe that no matter what, they will be convicted at a trial, so they'd better cut their loses & plea.
Posted by jewel54 on June 1, 2008 at 11:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Richard Jolly is lucky he got out of jail. Let's see how long he can stay out this time.
Posted by CaptPete on June 1, 2008 at 12:40 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Offering rewards is just one tactic way to keep cases moving along. Sometimes a slice of pizza or use of a cell phone will do the trick.
Posted by hunterboy on June 1, 2008 at 1:45 p.m. (Suggest removal)
the great detectives in this were Kelley from Mt Pleasant and Goldstein from the city of charleston GREAT WORK GUYS
You put a man in jail for 6 1/2 months for something he did not do get out your check books aolso they tryed to say it was jollys younger brother who did this you people just don't know what all they said and did
Posted by OntheSide on June 1, 2008 at 2:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Nothing about this surprises me. Law enforcement does what they want, when they want, however they want, to whomever they want. To Protect and Serve. When did that pass away?
Posted by whalernut on June 1, 2008 at 4:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Just how long will Richard stay out of jail is anyones guess. I happen to know Mr. Jolly and think a lot of him no matter how bad of a midlife crisis he had. (divorce)
Good Luck Richard.
Posted by jewel54 on June 1, 2008 at 8:08 p.m. (Suggest removal)
He hAD MORE THAN A DIVORCE GOING ON.
Posted by hunterboy on June 1, 2008 at 9:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Jewel54 as far as me needing to be in jail with jolly i have never been in any trouble i know jolly very well and yes he has had alot of prombles in his life some in which he cause himself but no one should be in jail for something they did not do god bless you
Posted by candygirl on June 1, 2008 at 10:15 p.m. (Suggest removal)
His past criminal record don't make him look like a angel. There are a people in jail waiting to be cleared ,so why is this so special?
Posted by reality_woman on June 2, 2008 at 12:38 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Just another reason why Scarlett needs to go.
Posted by lillycollette on June 2, 2008 at 7:36 a.m. (Suggest removal)
There is nothing in this article justifying an attack on Solicitor Wilson:
Quote: Wilson said her office acted at the request of Mount Pleasant and Charleston police. "As soon as law enforcement realized there had been a mistaken identity, they let us know and we dismissed the charges," she said.
Posted by ln1959 on June 2, 2008 at 8:57 a.m. (Suggest removal)
How often have we heard these words...I AM INNOCENT screamed around this country and has been ignored. Then 10 to 19 years later it's proven that this person is really INNOCENT.
True no one should have to use all of there life savings to fight false accusation and I do wish Mr. Jolly the best in his future. But it has been mention that he has not been an angle in life.
Posted by ashleyriver on June 2, 2008 at 10:58 a.m. (Suggest removal)
beerkrugel----I agree w/you about the vicious neice who created the entire situation. I fear that had I been the innocent victim, I'd have been re-arrested pretty soon after being released for kicking her directly in the posterior.
Posted by Marianne0558 on June 2, 2008 at 11:20 a.m. (Suggest removal)
They offered him a steak to plead guilty???
It better be 10-pounder Kobe beef steak...
Posted by SCgal on June 2, 2008 at 12:28 p.m. (Suggest removal)
**Shakes head** thinking unbelievable!
Posted by PalmettoDP on June 2, 2008 at 12:35 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The embarrassment to the agencies involved ought to deter this sort of thing from happening again - sure there are going to be mistaken identities, but suspects should be released after it is obvious a mistake has been made. Mr. Jolly is owed a public apology.
Posted by abitskeptical on June 2, 2008 at 4:23 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The issue is not that someone was wrongfully arrested. The police acted on tips & INITIALLY they had probable cause to make an arrest.
However, lack of further investigation & attention resulted in perpetuation of damage done by arresting the wrong man.
What is so disheartening is that this case highlights several problems at a couple of steps.
For various reasons (a topic for another time) law enforcement is overwhelmed.
The detectives who are to investigate cases prior to & subsequent to arrests are overwhelmed. This prevents them from doing the job as it should be done on every case. The focus becomes closing cases, rather than seeking truth & justice for all.
The public deserves to trust that they are protected from offenders, & this clearly does not happen if a person innocent of a particular crime is arrested for said crime, because when this happens it means that the real perpetrator remains at large...
A double whammy-innocent person damaged & the public is still at risk from an 'at large' offender.