Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Local mortgage experts weigh in

The Post and Courier
Tuesday, July 15, 2008


Local experts say the Federal Reserve's plan is good news for owners of houses such as this one for sale Monday in Hampton Park Terrace in peninsular Charleston.

Wade Spees
The Post and Courier

Local experts say the Federal Reserve's plan is good news for owners of houses such as this one for sale Monday in Hampton Park Terrace in peninsular Charleston.

Charleston-area mortgage experts said Monday they expect the federal government to succeed in working out a plan to support mortgage backers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac because of the vital role the two companies play in keeping home loans available and affordable.

"Fannie and Freddie are unique organizations," said Tom Hood, president and chief executive officer of First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Charleston, the largest banking company based in the Charleston area. "I have every expectation that there will be some kind of additional capital provided to them."

Dan Butts, a vice president and top Charleston-area loan officer for Winston-Salem, N.C.-based Bradford Mortgage, generally agreed.

"Fannie and Freddie have to survive," he said. Some form of rescue plan for the government-sponsored lenders "is going to happen."

What the two government-sponsored companies do that's so important is provide cash to the mortgage markets by buying loans and converting them into securities that are then traded in much the same way as stocks. By keeping an ample supply of money available for mortgage companies to lend, the two companies help keep borrowing costs down, which allows more people to be able to afford to buy homes.

As a result, Butts said, even with a rescue plan in place, the problems at Fannie and Freddie are likely to raise the cost of home loans very slightly, probably by one-eighth of a percentage point on most conventional loans.

However, Butts and Hood both said they didn't expect the problems at the government-sponsored companies to have much effect on people's decisions about whether to buy or sell a house.

"I don't know that the average person would link this to their decision to buy a home or refinance," Hood said. "If you're buying a home that's going to be your residence, I think people will go about the decision-making process pretty much as they always have."

Those types of long-term buyers should be focusing on whether the house really suits them, is in the right location, is affordable, and so on, he said.

Butts noted that despite the well-publicized problems at Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and the housing market in general, mortgages are easier to obtain today than late last year, when many lenders abruptly tightened their loan requirements after the industry's problems first surfaced.

Both companies own property in the Charleston area, acquired as a result of foreclosures, not through purchases. The number of properties, however, is much too small to affect the real estate market as a whole: Charleston County property records list 11 properties owned by Fannie Mae — officially Federal National Mortgage Corp. — and just two owned by Freddie Mac, or Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp.

At this point, Butts said, homeowners and potential home-buyers might have bigger issues to worry about in light of the failure of California-based bank IndyMac.

"I think the higher risk is other big institutions, big banks," he said. "Folks that are worried about Fannie and Freddie should be more worried about large banks."

Reach Michael Buettner at 937-5553 or mbuettner@postandcourier.com.




Article tools





Sponsored Links



Latest local stories

Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  1 comment(s)

Posted by GoBoilers on July 15, 2008 at 12:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)

With the credit market recovery predicated on the precarious balance derived from Federal Reserve liquidity injections, capital infusions by sovereign wealth funds and investment managers, and bailouts of major financial institutions, one must wonder if this period of stability has legs. Prior fits of turbulence in late summer 2007 and March 2008 led to dramatic market seizures that froze access to capital, eroded confidence in counterparties, and led to the demise of two dominant financial institutions. The current credit market predicament is the result of years of overabundant liquidity and exorbitant hubris among Wall Street bankers that led to an inexplicable decoupling of risk and return. Begrudgingly, market participants are revaluing deflated assets as the extent of credit impairment in the financial system continues to be exposed.

http://www.beyondthemargin.net/2008/07/w...




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)