Reminders that drivers can be intolerant of cyclists
The Post and Courier
Thursday, January 31, 2008
When I heard the report on CNN a week ago, my worst fear about bicycling on roads was confirmed: The anger of some motorists toward cyclists goes beyond the inconvenience of sharing pavement. In Arizona, a judge sentenced 27-year-old Melissa Arrington to more than 10 years, actually one shy of the maximum, for negligent homicide and two counts of aggravated DUI for running into and killing cyclist Paul L'Ecuyer on Dec. 1, 2006. While the minimum sentence is four years, the judge's decision to give her a harsher penalty was due to a telephone conversation she had with a male friend that was taped one week after the accident. During the conversation, the man told Arrington that an acquaintance believed she should get a medal and a parade because she had "taken out" a "tree hugger, a bicyclist, a Frenchman and a gay guy all in one shot." Instead of showing remorse, Arrington laughed. When the man said he knew it was a terrible thing to say, she responded, "No, it's not."
Alan Hawes The Post and Courier/File
As long as cars, bikes and pedestrians share the road, there are going to be accidents. But a little courtesy and common sense can help avoid them.
Superior Court Judge Michael Cruikshank says he found her response "breathtaking in its inhumanity." The outrage over Arrington's attitude spread across the country like wildfire, evident by responses on newspaper Web sites and blogs. Many wondered why this didn't qualify as a hate crime and why Arrington got only a decade of freedom taken away from her. The story not only brought back memories, some relatively fresh, about cyclists and pedestrians getting killed by drunken drivers and negligence on South Carolina roadways in recent years, but it also was a sobering reminder that intolerance and ignorance cannot be wiped out completely. There will be people reading this column who, silently or otherwise, will relate to Arrington. I may even get a cowardly anonymous call or e-mail saying what she said. I have experienced the unprovoked curses, obscene gestures and unnecessarily close drive-bys and cutoffs firsthand, and I don't ride nearly as much as some of my best friends. I assume these drivers feel their actions are worth the possibility of killing a cyclist, being locked up with criminals and maybe even having their mug shots published and broadcast in the media. Granted, as long as cars, bikes and pedestrians share the road, there are going to be fatal accidents. That's life. On every bike ride, I say short, silent prayers of thanks every time I survive a near miss or, preferably, have a ride without incident.
Check this out
Three-time U.S. time-trial cycling champion Dave Zabriskie recently founded Yield to Life, a nonprofit organization that promotes the protection of cyclists, safe cycling and the importance of clean air. See more at yieldtolife.com.
The Arrington case gives many of us a reason to pause and is chilling in another way. People in Charleston, like most cities, love to party. I was reminded of that after one of last weekend's big festivities. I won't say which one because there's always one. I heard lots of friends and acquaintances literally brag about how much they drank and then how they went out to bars afterward to drink some more. While I assume most drunken driving happens around midnight, this all took place during daylight hours on a sunny weekend afternoon, perfect for a wholesome bike, run or walk. As someone who is paid partly to be observant, I think there's a real disconnect for people in this town. We know we shouldn't drink and drive. The main concern often becomes the police, not the possibility of killing someone or even yourself. We know we should have a designated driver, but I can't remember the last time I heard someone say they were taking on that role. We need to remind ourselves of the importance of not driving while impaired. But there's yet another impairment that's increasingly becoming a similar plague to cyclists and pedestrians, and even other motorists, across our nation's roadways. That plague involves motorists who write and read text messages on cell phones, talk to total distraction on cell phones, and women who insist on putting on makeup while driving. I see it every day. I think all may be just as bad as drunken driving, yet we still have few laws to punish people who do those things at the risk of others. We need the laws, but it's probably going to take some lawmaker's daughter being killed before we get them. Whether you use roads for reasons other than driving, please vow to be tolerant, patient, alert, drive safely, plan the possibility of not driving and wait until you're parked to read or answer that text message. If for nothing else, do it for your future freedom.
Reach David Quick at 937-5516 or dquick@postandcourier.com.
|
Posted by mdtpace on January 31, 2008 at 9:45 a.m. (Suggest removal)
This should have been on the front page of the paper. This is a serious problem. Charleston has the worst, rudest drivers of anywhere I have ever been. On top of that, the police departments do nothing to change that. Red lights are like a suggestion. I emailed Mayor Riley about the problem downtown and received a response with in a couple of days, as well as an email from the head of the traffic division for CPD. Very responsive. I haven't seen much improvement downtown, but at least they are trying. On the other side of the Cooper, I emailed Mayor Hallman, have never received a response, and there is almost no crime in Mt Pleasant, so what the hell are the police doing, especially when there are 3 or 4 cars in a parking lot, side by side, just hanging out. Go pull someone for speeding down Coleman, or running a red light, or doing any number of other things that are going to kill someone. I guess I should have written my complaint on a cocktail napkin at T-Bonz if I wanted the mayor to see it. Just one more example of how Mt Pleasant town leadership is a bunch of unprofessional half wits. Mt Pleasant would have to be the most unfriendly cycling/pedestrian community in the area. You stand a better chance cycling down Rivers Ave than Coleman Blvd.
Posted by coachken on January 31, 2008 at 11:02 a.m. (Suggest removal)
On every bike ride, I say short, silent prayers of thanks every time I survive a near miss or, preferably, have a ride without incident.
I say prayers too. As my heart rate returns to normal and I can resume the posted speed limit after being forced to hit the brakes to accomodate a bike rider. There are appropriate places to ride and others that are not. Why is it against the law to ride a bike on the interstate? I do not get it. Yes, there is a serious disconnect. The interstate has a wide paved shoulder. Highway 61 does not. Same speed limit and it is legal to ride there even though there are nice winding curves and minimal shoulder. Every weekend there are thrill seakers out there sharing the road with motorist. I do not mind sharing the road when there is enough to share. I do have serious concerns about some bike rider ruining my life.
I pay taxes on my vehicle, insurance, and am examined by the highway department for the "PRIVILEDGE" of operating a motor vehicle. If I do not obey the laws my privilidge is taken away. What are the requirements to ride a bike on a 55 mph highway, what is the liability? There should be laws and signs posted to help the bile riders mingle in traffic with liscensed motorist obeying the law. I totally agree that laws would be good to help protect those with poor judgement.
Keep on praying, I will. God does not protect stupid.
Ken Herns
Posted by crankyyankee on January 31, 2008 at 1:09 p.m. (Suggest removal)
People on a 40lb bike shouldn't argue with a three thousand pound auto! You didn't do well in science did you?
Posted by theronce on January 31, 2008 at 1:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
The most foolish sign on our highways is "Share the Road". Without a dedicated bicycle lane, a four-wheel motor vehicle cannot share the road with a bicyclist on a two-way road. You must give the bicyclist the road! To avoid an accident with the bicyclist, the motorist is obligated to either remain behind the slow-moving bicycle or pass in the other lane (with multi-ton vehicles approaching your multi-ton vehicle at high speed) or hit the ditch. Many bicyclists are just plain stupid to get on some of these highways at the times of day that they do. Just because you can and have the right does not mean that you should. If you are on a busy two-lane highway, you will be resented because everyone else must defer and give you the road. It is too narrow to share! Dumb, dumb, dumb.