Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Some legislators call foul on overzealous parents

The Post and Courier
Wednesday, February 27, 2008


One minute everybody's enjoying the game, and the next there's a swing and a miss.

Sometimes, parents can get a little too emotional at the ballpark.

That's why some South Carolina lawmakers are pushing a bill that would cost you up to 60 days in jail and $1,000 for assaulting a coach, an umpire, even the scorekeeper.

The idea comes from state athletic directors and rec center officials who are looking for a way to quell what has become the ugly underside of little league and community center sports.

What used to be one of the most wholesome places for families to relax has in recent years become a place that can get about as ugly, or as profane, as an episode of "The Sopranos," a place where parents are forced to sign codes of conduct before they can even sit in the stands.

Although the state House passed legislation to increase assault penalties against sports officials two years ago, the Senate has refused to take a swing. And on Tuesday, a Senate committee refused to touch the proposal once again.

Parks officials aren't ready to give up, and promise a lobbying effort to fight for the rights of 400,000 volunteers and recreation workers in the state, people they say need more protection from what's becoming an increasingly common problem.

At a glance

South Carolina law allows magistrates to punish people convicted of assault and battery with 30 days of jail time and up to $500 in fines. A proposed bill from Sen. Vincent Sheheen, D-Camden, would increase those penalties to up to 60 days in jail, $1,000 in fines, or both, for anyone convicted of assaulting a sports official or coach at any athletic facility during any athletic event.

"Our state's like a pressure cooker, ready to explode," said James Headley, executive director of the South Carolina Recreation and Parks Association.

While there has been little violence on Lowcountry ball fields, many coaches admit to hearing a few choice words on occasion. Some experts who track the trend say that fights between parents, coaches and umpires have just about quadrupled in the last decade. Parents can be suspended for a few games, or even a whole season, for letting loose a few foul words over a foul ball.

Aside from the safety of coaches and referees, some parks workers say there just needs to be something in place to show the kids there are repercussions for parents behaving badly.

"When something like this happens, it's in front of the kids, and that's got to be fairly traumatic," said Timmy Linker, who has coached St. Andrews teams for 40 years. "It would be good to have a law that would show kids that something like that's not tolerated in society."

Steve Nida, the head of the Psychology Department at The Citadel, has studied incidents of violence at youth league and community center sporting events as an athletic director and as a psychologist. He said it's often the same type of person causing problems.

"So many of these parents are so overzealous because they see their children living out their unrealized dreams," Nida said. "Often the parent hasn't been

very successful. Their child is an extension of them, so a lot of the time it's parents becoming too involved in the process."

Martin Williams, the director of rural recreation sports in the St. Paul community in Charleston County, said he wants the state to do anything it can to

strengthen laws protecting coaches and referees, most of whom are volunteers.

"I've never known anything to get out of control," Williams said, "but it's very important that we maintain control."

Johnny Cribb, athletic director for the Mount Pleasant Recreation Department, said the town is lucky to have good families involved in its sports programs. But, he said, it's also good that volunteers monitor every game and break up disagreements.

"Every big thing started off as a little thing," Cribb said.

Although the bill had a good-sized cheering section at Tuesday's Senate Judiciary Committee meeting, the panel voted 13-7 basically to do nothing with it, leaving it lingering in committee limbo. The bill's sponsor, Sen. Vincent Sheheen, D-Camden, said it's a shame that senators can't see the problem.

"I've worked over the last year with others to try to deal with a real problem we're having. Folks out there in a high-pressure environment are, frankly,

committing assault and battery against sports officials and coaches. It is particularly dangerous because there are often young people around."

Sheheen said the bill likely will go nowhere unless the public gets behind it and starts calling lawmakers. Headley said that's what he plans to do, and has the perfect place to advertise the bill — hundreds of recreation and community centers around the state.

"I think people ought to be outraged," he said.

Reach Brian Hicks at 937-5561 or bhicks@postandcourier.com. Reach Yvonne Wenger at ywenger@postandcourier.com or 803-799-9051.








Latest local stories




Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  5 comment(s)

Posted by proud2bme on February 27, 2008 at 7:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)

What is it with requesting all these laws for this and that?
Put a police officer/sesurity guard or even a dang bouncer of sorts at these games to intervene when these psycho parents start to get rowdy.



Posted by oldglory on February 27, 2008 at 8:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)

For a state that doesn't like to legislate every little thing ...



Posted by theronce on February 27, 2008 at 8:34 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Don't we already have laws against assault in a 100 ways and public profanity, etc. If we do not enforce those already on the books, what makes anyone think that another like it will be?



Posted by crankyyankee on February 27, 2008 at 10:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)

When you think of local law enforcement all you need to do is look at the show of force the police used to close down Pappy's illegal poker machines (there was no public outcry to enforce this law), then look at the thousands of illegals residing in North Charleston (there is a major public outcry to enforce these laws). That pretty much tells you how ineffective law enfrocement in the State is. Law enforcement does what the elected officals want not what the public wants and why is that?



Posted by theronce on February 27, 2008 at 1:21 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I have no beef with the men and woment in blue. Law enforcement starts with the political will. Those that we elected do not have the political will to reduce crime. Rounding up the poker machines is important, because they cannot get their cut from them. Incumbants have no fear of the electorate and therefore no respect for them. We are so dumb.




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)