Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


State might check cargo

Bill calls for inspections of imports

The Post and Courier
Sunday, February 10, 2008


Bill calls for inspections of imports

How it would work

A bill set to be introduced in the S.C. House would create the Bureau of Consumer Safety within the Department of Health and Environmental Control.

Essentially, the bureau would create a list of target countries and spot check their exports at the Charleston port, weigh stations and rail yards. Goods that don't meet the bureau's health and safety standards, after an appeals process, would be declared contraband and destroyed.

Bureau costs would be paid for with inspection fees and fines.

COLUMBIA — A state legislator has an idea he thinks will help keep toxic toys and toothpaste laced with traces of poison off South Carolina store shelves.

Rep. Chip Limehouse, R-Charleston, said he has a bill ready to file that would create a Bureau of Consumer Safety to monitor the health and safety standards of products coming into the state from specific countries, including China.

"We're not looking for any additional duties at the state level; however, I don't think the consumers care whether it's the federal government or the state government who protects them," Limehouse said. "They just want to know that if they use the toothpaste they bought at Wal-Mart, it's not going to put them in an early grave.

"The time for sitting back and waiting for the federal government is gone."

Limehouse isn't the only one frustrated with the federal government's response to the potentially deadly chemicals found in China's exports during the past year, including pet food that was blamed for the deaths of thousands of dogs and cats.

Don Mays, senior director of product safety at Consumer Reports, said states have responded in various ways to the "product safety crisis." He said, though, the creation of a South Carolina Bureau of Consumer Safety would be an enforcement nightmare.

Although not all the details are ironed out, Limehouse envisions the bureau performing spot checks on cargo exported by a select list of countries as the products enter South Carolina by port, truck and rail. Any costs would be offset entirely, as outlined in the legislation, by inspection fees and fines.

Mays said state legislators should focus on lobbying Congress to increase efforts at the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission.

The commission is charged with protecting the public from products that pose certain risks to consumers. The commission has responded to the recent incidents by putting new surveillance measures in place at ports and elsewhere, among other initiatives.

"The Consumer Product Safety Commission is not up to doing its job," Mays added. "It is woefully underfunded and understaffed."

A bill under consideration in Congress would give the commission money to increase staff and more authority to set standards such as altering the acceptable lead content in toys.

Limehouse said he hopes there's no need for his legislation to come to fruition. He wants the federal government to step up, but in the meantime, he will be drumming up support for the bill.

"Hopefully, my legislation is going to raise eyebrows in Beijing and Washington, and they are going to realize we are not going to sit back and take what comes our way," he said.

Reach Yvonne Wenger at 803-799-9051 or ywenger@postandcourier.com.







Latest local stories




Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  2 comment(s)

Posted by oldglory on February 10, 2008 at 8:11 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Somehow, I thought we'd already been there, done that :)



Posted by KidYendor on February 10, 2008 at 11:52 p.m. (Suggest removal)

We have enough bureaus and departments in South Carolina. Chip should focus on encouraging manufacturing the items in question in South Carolina by lowering the financial tax burden and paperwork on businesses/manufacturing companies resulting in easy testing as they leave the businesses. This is much easier than going into cargo ship containers, trucks and rail cars.




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)