Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Force Protection says 2007 earnings will be lower than 2006

The Post and Courier
Friday, August 29, 2008


Force Protection Inc. has expanded its re-evaluation of its past financial reports and now believes that when it eventually reports its earnings for 2007, the figure will be "significantly lower" than the profit it reported in 2006. In addition, the company said its accounting problems have not yet been solved.

The Ladson-based maker of armored military vehicles said late Thursday it has determined that it must restate its previous financial statements for the first and second quarters of 2007 and that the reports it previously issued for those periods "should not be relied upon."

In a written remarks, the company said those statements contained accounting errors, "including errors associated with recognizing the value of revenue, certain accrued liabilities, inventory and deferred taxes in the proper quarterly periods."

Force Protection faces delisting of its shares from the Nasdaq Stock Market unless it meets a Sept. 15 deadline to file its delayed financial report for the full 2007 fiscal year. The company said it intends to file that report "on or before" that date, and that it will include a figure of about $890 million in net sales, well above the $196 million it reported in 2006.

However, "the company expects that 2007 net income will be significantly lower than the $16.6 million" it reported in 2006.

Force Protection first disclosed in March that its internal accounting controls were "ineffective."

This week the company said that "management does not believe that the material weaknesses" in its accounting "will be remediated by Sept. 30" and that when it files its financial reports for the first three quarters of this year, they also will contain "material weaknesses."

Force Protection's shares were trading at about $4 at midmorning Friday, down about 5.6 percent from Thursday's close.

Read more in tomorrow's editions of The Post and Courier.








Sponsored Links



Latest local stories

Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  1 comment(s)

Posted by charlestonnative1963 on August 29, 2008 at 11:04 p.m. (Suggest removal)

I want Bill Clinton back in the White House. I never worried about money back in the good ole days. And I could not care less who he slept with, had sex with, or lied to about it...




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)