Gambling law change unlikely anytime soon2 local lawmakers favor legalizing casual poker, but it's an election year By Robert Behre (Contact)
The Post and Courier
Tuesday, April 8, 2008
This weekend's high-profile raid on a Hanahan poker ring ultimately might encourage state lawmakers to modernize the state's gambling laws, but don't bet on anything passing this year. So say two local lawmakers who favor loosening state law to allow casual poker games and church raffles — as well as to clarify that such games as Monopoly and Yahtzee are legal. State Rep. Wallace Scarborough, R-James Island, has tried to get a bill passed since last year, when legal questions prompted WTMA- AM to fold a planned poker tourney designed to raise money for a local cancer charity. Scarborough said friendly poker games are common all over Charleston County, and he wants to allow them, provided they aren't advertised, don't involve paid employees and the house doesn't get a cut. Even if Scarborough were to get his way, it's unclear whether the Hanahan game would have been legal. Still, Scarborough said the recent bust helps draw attention to the outdated law. "The more they bust people, the more they make it their Enemy No. 1, the more the general public is going to say, 'We've had enough. Change the law,' " he said. State Sen. Robert Ford, D-Charleston, co-sponsored a bill to modernize the state's gambling laws, but it died after some senators were uncomfortable with the idea, particularly in an election year. "I'm sure on every street in every community in this state they've got a card game going on right now," he said. "Everybody who has a television can watch it on television right now. The television has taught everybody how to play poker and now everybody wants to gamble." Ford said he would go a step beyond Scarborough and make gambling legal — so it can be taxed. "Right now we're looking like a bunch of yahoos because we're leaving hundreds of millions of dollars on the table. Those people who gambled on video poker are still gambling. Why not collect some taxes on it?" Reach Robert Behre at rbehre@postandcourier.com or 937-5771. |
Article tools
| |||
|
Notice about comments: Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website. Full terms and conditions can be read here. |
Comments
This article has 14 comment(s)
Posted by BillMan on April 8, 2008 at 12:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I say keep the law, just bust up a few houses every night and carry them away to jail! Soon the tax base will be diluted enough to lay off enough officers, prosecutors, etc. that they will wise up that money is best spent elsewhere! Shame that 10 months of police work could'nt have gone toward stopping all those horrible crimes I see on the news every night! Nah, good jobs guys!!!
Posted by stand828 on April 8, 2008 at 2:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Something must be wrong...I'm starting to agree with Robert Ford more and more.
Posted by Thomas1776 on April 8, 2008 at 5:14 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Gambling law change unlikely anytime soon. But members of the House of Representatives and Senate will.
Posted by Thomas1776 on April 8, 2008 at 5:15 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Abolish the State Lottery and Scratch Off Tickets now! Fair is fair.
Posted by lillycollette on April 8, 2008 at 5:59 a.m. (Suggest removal)
The major attraction of this gambling is the chance of quick money that is -- NOT -- taxed.
‘Dead-beat Dad’ has been such a popular buzz-word why not initiate ‘Dead-beat Tax Payer”?
If these people had to set up a legitimate business in an appropriate district, pay regulated wages and taxes they would fast lose interest in the endeavor.
Posted by Mayor on April 8, 2008 at 6:01 a.m. (Suggest removal)
lillycollette, go back to your blankie.
Posted by abitskeptical on April 8, 2008 at 6:19 a.m. (Suggest removal)
So, let me get this straight lillycollete-decriminalizing gambling would NOT lead to its increase activity? Interesting concept.
Posted by lillycollette on April 8, 2008 at 6:33 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Is the little lab-rat Mayor cranky this morning? Your ilk blatantly supports the open violation of law. Yet you get your panties in a wad when I speak in favor of it. Oooh, you are so special you cute little thing. Now go get back up on the porch with the rest of the puppies.
Posted by prettywoman2457 on April 8, 2008 at 6:35 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Awwww...Some people that have noses so far up in the air have been brought down to a level that they now see that they can be touched. It sure was a pleasure to see Don Sorenson standing there with his tail tucked in between his legs. Many laws in SC need changing. Laws like this show us just how backwards the state is. Money talks and the average man goes to jail for some of the same crimes. A slap on the back, like Ravenel, will be the only punishment. So, why bother!! Wasted resources will be the outcome of this, but the good news is....Sorenson, Ravenel and others will have a record that will follow them for the rest of their lives. Lets see what the community will have for jobs for these people in the future.
Posted by lillycollette on April 8, 2008 at 6:46 a.m. (Suggest removal)
abitskeptical: Do you have some point in repeating and putting a spin on what I said? I just don't get where you're going with this.
Posted by wpc3iop on April 8, 2008 at 9:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)
It's scary to me to realize that I may agree with Sen. Ford about something...although I bet we wouldn't agree on how to spend the tax revenue that would be generated by legalized gambling!
Posted by KidYendor on April 8, 2008 at 9:47 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Re-legalize video poker.
Posted by Thomas1776 on April 8, 2008 at 11:39 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Mayor is a joke, isn't he. lolololol.
Posted by 4HomePoker on April 9, 2008 at 3:27 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Lilli,
I know most of the folks that were busted in this so called gambling ring. At least 15 of those listed presently run their own businesses and pay more taxes a year than most folks make. They are successful and should have the right in this country to do with their money what they wish. The dealers in these games are not paid but tipped by the players. If I elect to tip a bell hop or waitress or donate my money to special olympics(all of which I do annualy) that is fine. The host do not make money on these games they take and agreed upon amount for the night to cover the expenses for food(which is catered at times), drinks(alcoholic as well as non-alcoholic), cards, clean-up and any other expenses. This is not done for profit it's done so people can just show and have fun rather than to try and coordinate all the individuals bringing something.
Before you make all knowing blanket statements you should go to a home poker party and see for yourself. I have never seen a fight, drugs, or anything clandestined at any of the games I attended.
I hope the task force doesn't have time to track me down through this post!!!!!! LOL