Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Homeowners getting out of home they can't afford could face tax hit

By Susan Tompor
Detroit Free Press
Monday, September 24, 2007


The last thing somebody who couldn't pay the mortgage would expect is a tax document in the mail that proclaims they magically got an extra $20,000 in income they never touched. But that's exactly the tortured tax picture that faces many troubled homeowners.

Thousands of families could face an unexpected tax hit if they went through foreclosure, worked out some unusual deals with the bank to refinance or sold homes for less than the outstanding debt.

Michigan Democratic U.S. Sen. Debbie Stabenow told me during a phone interview that she'd like to see this unfair tax rule change by year's end. On Aug. 31, President Bush gave his support to Stabenow's mortgage relief act as part of his package to assist homeowners.

It's one of those tax rules that not many people know about because home values typically have gone up, not down. But it could have a big impact on families nationally.

Say a homeowner loses a job, needs to move and has to sell the house for $80,000 instead of the $100,000 owed on the mortgage. If the bank forgives $20,000, as is possible in some cases, it has to be reported as income. For many families, an extra $20,000 could mean that they've got to pay an extra $3,000 to $5,000 or more in federal income taxes.

"The general rule is that cancellation of debt is taxable income," said Bob D. Scharin, RIA senior tax analyst at Thomson Tax & Accounting.

Or how about a homeowner who is able to pay the mortgage at the initial adjustable rate, but then the rate readjusts upward significantly, and suddenly the mortgage payment is unaffordable.

Say the homeowner would like to refinance. But there's a snag. Some homes now are being valued below the original mortgage taken out three, four or five years ago. So the house might be valued at $100,000 instead of $120,000. And the homeowner might not have enough equity in the house to deal with the difference.

If the bank steps in and refinances the house at $100,000 instead of $120,000, the homeowner would run up against that tax hit.

In some cases, consumers are able to avoid the added tax.

"The one big exception is bankruptcy," said James Jenkins, president of Jenkins & Co., a tax firm in Southfield, Mich. If the debt is discharged in bankruptcy, no tax.

Another option: Taxpayers could file a complicated tax form, Form 982, to show that they were insolvent.

"How's the average guy going to possibly know the rules on this?" Jenkins asked, noting that an experienced tax preparer could save some consumers money and avoid much of the tax.

Reach Susan Tompor at stompor@freepress.com.




Article tools





Sponsored Links



Latest local stories

Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  2 comment(s)

Posted by charleston on September 25, 2007 at 7:26 a.m. (Suggest removal)

Sorry. If a homeowner is "relieved" or "forgiven" of any amount of money associated with a debt whether that debt be from credit cards or the example here, home mortgages, then that homeowner SHOULD BE paying income taxes on that amount. Give me a break!



Posted by clyoushaete on September 26, 2007 at 6:48 p.m. (Suggest removal)

One shouldn't compare mortgages with credit card debt. In both mortgage examples, the homeowners do not "own" the homes. In credit card debt, you alredy have the "goods".




(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)