Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Summerville to Charleston: Making rail a reality

By Neal Peirce and Curtis Johnson
Sunday, September 23, 2007


OK. You've studied it — twice. Now it's time to write checks and try it out. The track exists, with the owner, Norfolk Southern, open to a track-sharing arrangement.

Sure, there are issues. Some track upgrading and better signaling at cross streets are needed, and at the downtown Charleston end, a fix for that last fifth of a mile to the Visitors Center where the track was ripped out and one business must be bought and cleared.

The good news is that a rail corridor with track exists. It runs right along the most congested transportation route in the region — Interstate 26. And matching the Visitors Center at the south, Summerville has a great spot for park-and-ride that offers shared parking for downtown shoppers and commuters.

The latest "feasibility" study, completed in 2006, says commuter rail would attract riders in this corridor. Commuter rail does what its name implies. It runs train cars on freight tracks several trips in the morning and afternoon, serving people commuting to major job centers.

The biggest job centers in the region are in North Charleston and downtown Charleston. Worker travel worries are a growing threat to employers. The president of the Medical University of South Carolina told us commuting and parking issues were the principal reason for high turnover in his nursing staff.

Commuter rail enjoys a major cost advantage: the study showed the costs of track upgrades, signal improvements, cars and engines could be as low as $48 million. Yearly operating costs would be around $3 million, or $1.66 a passenger if riders were charged $3 a trip.

It's amazing — Even when modest numbers like those are published, the critics emerge railing about giveaway subsidies. OK, what do the roads cost?

The truth is that no state has ever combined the courage and acumen to calculate the per-driver per-trip subsidy for its roadways. Our guess is that if road construction, maintenance, and replacement, plus all the road-related services, emergency assistance and environmental impacts were added up, there's be a massive road subsidy figure — even after gas tax receipts are subtracted. And the critics would go home

Trains in the morning could leave from Summerville, making limited stops, headed to North Charleston, then ending up in Charleston. The trip would take 29 minutes at an expected average speed of 40 miles per hour. That would beat most motorists making their way through traffic on I-26.

At other times, the trains could serve tourists, conventioneers, people headed downtown for theater or a great meal or young people enjoying a lark on metal instead of rubber wheels. Remember: Almost every transit trip means one fewer on the crowded roadways.

Some organizations, such as the Coastal Conservation League, say they prefer light rail, which runs on or near roadways, features more modern cars and reaches more locations. It's the choice in such cities as Dallas and Salt Lake City. But light rail costs much more and requires specialized tracks and overhead electric service. Our guess is the Lowcountry will be smarter to start with a commuter rail — to learn to roll on rails before it opens its wallet to lay down new ones.




Article tools




Latest local stories





Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  0 comment(s)


(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News


Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)