Connect with us:   Subscribe to the paper  |   View the mobile edition  |   Get daily e-mail news  |   Get mobile alerts  |   Share your photos  |   Report news  |   Place an ad  |   Contact us


Damage to woodpecker nests feared

Awendaw council backs development

The Post and Courier
Wednesday, May 9, 2007


AWENDAW — Despite warnings from area conservation groups about a development's potential to destroy habitat for the red-cockaded woodpecker, Town Council gave preliminary approval to a large development in the center of town.

Members of the Coastal Conservation League, in conjunction with the Southern Environmental Law Center, said they would sue the town if it gives the rezoning final approval, because the development's potential effect on the woodpecker would violate the Endangered Species Act.

Developers call the proposed subdivision Fenwick at Bull's Bay, a 305-home gated community on 196 acres off Doar Road. Council voted 3-0 Monday to give the rezoning ordinance first-reading approval, the first step toward approving the development.

The presence of the bird could be a deterrent to further development, as it has been in other areas.

Last year, after the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service stopped development in Boiling Spring Lakes, N.C., because of the woodpecker, residents cut down thousands of trees to prevent their homes from being classified as endangered species wildlife habitat. They feared that an inability to develop their land would devalue their properties.

But such cases are rare, said Jason Ayers, a wildlife biologist at Fish and Wildlife's Charleston office. Ayers said the agency usually is able to work with developers to protect the bird, either by setting aside at least 75 acres for habitat, trying to move nests or by having the developers contribute to conservation of other habitats.

Biologists have described the woodpecker as a "keystone species," because so many other animals benefit from it. Previous preservation efforts have led to the restoration of a half million acres of longleaf pine forest in the state, a 25 percent increase since 1995.

Though the nearby Francis Marion National Forest is a major habitat for the bird, it is not known whether the Fenwick site has any nests. Birds on private property are usually handled by site visits on a case-by-case basis.

Residents voiced their opinions Monday for and against the measure to a standing-room-only crowd at Town Hall.

Proponents argued that development is inevitable, and that this could mean more goods and services for the town.

Andrew Manigault, who is selling most of the land for the development, said he was frustrated with residents who aren't originally from Awendaw but don't want more development.

"They don't want anybody else to move in," he said. "It's ridiculous. You can't stop growing."

Those opposed to the development said they feared it was too dense and would harm the environment in a pristine area.

"We have no issue with someone selling his property; that's our right as citizens. But we feel that it should be done with some sense of responsibility to one's neighbors," said resident Nell Daniels. "We are surrounded by federal lands, by the Francis Marion National Forest and by the Cape Romain National Wildlife Refuge. We have the privilege of living here, but we also have the responsibility to preserve and protect these lands."

A spokesman for Coastal Venture Group, the developer of Fenwick at Bull's Bay, declined to comment.

Reach Lucia Walinchus at 937-5921 or at lwalinchus@postandcourier.com.




Article tools




Latest local stories




Sponsored Links


Notice about comments:
Charleston.net is pleased to offer readers the ability to comment on stories. We expect our readers to engage in lively, yet civil discourse. Charleston.net does not edit user submitted statements and we cannot promise that readers will not occasionally find offensive or inaccurate comments posted in the comments area. Responsibility for the statements posted lies with the person submitting the comment, not charleston.net. If you find a comment that is objectionable, please click "suggest removal" and we will review it for possible removal. Please be reminded, however, that in accordance with our Terms of Use and federal law, we are under no obligation to remove any third party comments posted on our website.
Full terms and conditions can be read here.

Comments

This article has  0 comment(s)


(Requires free registration.)

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

Comment:

Search Charleston.Net Archives for Latest News






Charleston.Net Customer Care | Subscribe to Paper, Register for email news updates, manage your online account, place a classified ad, or contact us




Charleston.net logo

Copyright © 1997 - 2008 the Evening Post Publishing Co.

Use of this site signifies your agreement to the Terms of service, Privacy policy and our Parental consent form. (Updated 2/9/2007)