Sand battle won't blow over
IOP man wins right to appeal permit
The Post and Courier
Tuesday, July 31, 2007
ISLE OF PALMS — The Wild Dunes sandbag fiasco just sank a little deeper. The S.C. Supreme Court on Monday ruled that an island resident has the right to appeal a state permit that allows moving sand from public to private areas. That takes the five-year-old case that led to the mess back to the courts for hearing. With high tides lapping at the resort's eroded oceanfront golf course and six condominium complexes, it could be months or more before any other beach renourishment plan clears regulatory and legal hurdles. The properties now are protected by a wall of sandbags, which are being shredded by tides. Jim Smiley, who lives just outside the private resort's gate, appealed a state Office of Ocean and Coastal Resources Management permit that would have allowed the Wild Dunes Community Association to scrape sand from the beach each month to rebuild dunes for its beachfront property owners. Smiley said recently he simply didn't want to see 25,000 cubic yards of sand per month scraped from the public beach a foot and a half deep to build dunes on private property. OCRM attorneys argued that as a resident Smiley had no "standing," no grounds to appeal. Smiley lost two earlier court rounds before the Monday ruling. "Thank goodness," said attorney Jimmy Chandler, whose South Carolina Environmental Law Project took over the case pro bono after Smiley lost earlier legal rounds. "It basically keeps the courthouse door open for citizens who want to protect the public's interest. We're back at square one now." Attorneys for OCRM would not comment because the case is still under litigation, said Thom Berry, spokesman for the S.C. Health and Environmental Control. The ruling bolsters other residents who say they will appeal if the state issues a permit to dredge from Dewees Inlet at the tip of the resort. Beachfront resort property owners want to take sand from a spit that has formed near Cedar Creek, and property owners who use the spit as a beach are ready to sue to stop them. The only other solution, dredging sand from offshore, has a rule-of-thumb cost of $1 million per mile for each year between renourishment projects. Chandler couldn't say immediately what impact the ruling might have on the overall Wild Dunes situation. He has been in ongoing meetings with OCRM and property officials. "I was always sure we would eventually prevail," Smiley said Monday by e-mail. "Without this decision, citizens would have lost their ability to contest virtually all (state) permitting decisions." Reach Bo Petersen at 745-5852 or bpetersen@postandcourier.com.
|
Posted by singleroni on July 31, 2007 at 7:22 a.m. (Suggest removal)
they know of the danger when they build there. Why should we pay the price but can not enjoy the view, location or even a walk on the private beaches. That is part of the price of living on the land near the cost. Public funds should not be used for private lands.
Posted by trm2105 on July 31, 2007 at 8:17 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Wild Dunes residents, start learning to tread water! You bought the land, you bought the problem.
Posted by richturner76 on July 31, 2007 at 8:43 a.m. (Suggest removal)
They should go back up north to the beaches up there!!
Posted by deputy216 on July 31, 2007 at 9:30 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I guess this is like eating your cake and ice cream at the same time.You want to live in a private resort and let evbryone else pick up the tab.
Posted by cede on July 31, 2007 at 11 a.m. (Suggest removal)
Wow! I've considered moving to the Charleston area for some time now -- but after reading the above comments, I see that there are many unhappy people there -- guess I'll take my positive attitude elsewhere!
Posted by sailman2 on July 31, 2007 at noon (Suggest removal)
No, most people in Charleston are pretty happy. Beach erosion and renourishment is an on-going issue and one that will not go away. Regarding Isle of Palms, it will probably get worse and the "noise" will get louder. The solution? Live on the mainland, since that will be beachfront in several decades.
Posted by mac0cm4 on July 31, 2007 at 1:18 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Mother Nature always wins the battle...this will prove true with all of our barrier islands.
Posted by trm2105 on July 31, 2007 at 6:16 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Cede,
you're more than welcome to come. just don't make the same mistake these folks did. There's a lot of beautiful places in the lowcountry.
Posted by newbattleaxe on July 31, 2007 at 7:58 p.m. (Suggest removal)
It's all going to come down to who has the deeper pockets - OCRM or the Wild Dunes. Fifty years down the road, where will the Wild Dunes folks get their sand? IF that end of the island still exists, that is.