Residents battle coalshipper
Kinder Morgan wants to expand N. Chas. facility
The Post and Courier
Wednesday, August 8, 2007
Tempers flared over health concerns, traffic worries and coal-covered boats. Dozens of people crowded into a meeting room on the former Charleston Naval Base on Tuesday night to hear officials from the Department of Health and Environmental Control give updates on air quality permit applications they've received from a coal transport company. One-by-one, those attending passionately spoke out against Kinder Morgan's proposal to expand its 208-acre facility on the Cooper River, saying that coal and cement particles from the facility pollute the air and jeopardize their health. But their mood sank after one official said that the permits likely will be granted with conditions. Rhonda Thompson, director of environmental services for DHEC's Bureau of Air Quality, said that the agency probably will approve the expansion when officials figure out better ways to monitor the company's coal dust emissions. Officials at the Texas-based energy company want to triple the amount of coal and other dry products that pass through the facility each year to more than 10 million tons. The proposal is driven by the trade in cheaper international coal, which energy companies need to fuel the nation's demand for power. Arthur Rudolph, the company's regional general manager, said the company has spent more than $1.6 million during the last year to improve the facility. It also has hired extra supervisors and put its 75 employees through more training, he said. "Kinder Morgan is a very proactive, environmentally conscious company," he said. All the improvements haven't cut back on the amount of dust that floats into the air and onto boats that dock at the nearby Cooper River Marina, said Manager Matt Driscoll. And residents at the meeting repeatedly asked what it would take for the agency to deny the company's request. "All these people are against it. The city's against it. How much (citizen input) is it going to take?" said Bob King, a North Charleston city councilman. King and others asked tough questions of company officials and state regulators. Gayle Frampton, chairman of North Charleston's Citizens Advisory Council, wanted to know if the fish in the Cooper River that ingest coal-tainted water are safe to eat. Neal Petersen, who docks his boat at the marina, wanted to know why trucks have to cover their containers on the highway while Kinder Morgan's rail cars can travel uncovered through local neighborhoods. The expansion also would triple the amount of time local roads are blocked by trains moving in and out of the facility. Residents worried that the trains would block emergency responders, but Rudolph said they are dispatched from all over the area — and both sides of the tracks — in an emergency. Residents pointed to the environmental violations by Kinder Morgan facilities both here and at other sites across the country. DHEC inspectors visited Kinder Morgan's site four times in May and found thicker-than-allowed dust clouds, broken equipment and missing maintenance records. Sailboat owner Ken Bonerigo captured a video of a crane that scooped up water from the river and dumped it on a ship to rinse it off. "That is not an activity that is ever going to happen again. We were disturbed when we saw that operation," Rudolph told the crowd. Because of a state law, DHEC officials couldn't consider those violations. They blamed state lawmakers for failing to pass the "bad boy" laws that punish corporations with a poor track record.
Reach Katy Stech at 937-5549 or kstech@postandcourier.com.
|
Posted by ansel757 on August 8, 2007 at 11:04 a.m. (Suggest removal)
I have been reading The Post and Courier for about month to get an idea of the business, real estate, school and social environment of Charleston. I am part of two familes and two companies that are considering relocating to Charleston, or another similar city, within the next year. One of the cities we had looked at, we decided against because quite frankly, the air stinks and is not good quality. Charleston has been looking better and better to us. However, today I read about the company that wants to enlarge and increase air pollution with black coal dust. I sincerely hope that does not happen. Charleston looks like a healthy place to live and work. It will not be as appealing with a black cloud of stinky coal dust hanging over the area. Money is a huge consideration in any business venture and more jobs are always welcome, however, when the environment looks and smells like one of the steel mill or mining towns, no one wants to live there. Good luck to all you concerned citizens that are oposing this.
Posted by hollywood123 on August 8, 2007 at 4:33 p.m. (Suggest removal)
I believe that before everyone starts pointing fingers and puts a hold on companies from expanding in Charleston or coming to the area. We need to look at the evidence that is presented by DHEC, this is their job. For ansel757 it is probably a smart idea for you to visit the area and then make a decision. I also heard that Kinder Morgan was going to provide air monitors for the surrounding area.
Posted by bobo on August 8, 2007 at 5:14 p.m. (Suggest removal)
Hollywood sounds like they work for kinder morgan...monitoring devices for air quality without sound abatement measures( which Kinder's existing violations show them to be devoid of) is like measuring the height of the water rising in the Titanic.
True abatement of the dust pollution in the coal cars and the coal piles would cost about $1.00 a ton of coal...Kinder currently spends about 1 to 6 cents per ton, depending on how long they take to amortize the equipment.
Where is mayor Riley and our state legislators- the silence is deafening.